General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. About the history of the formation of TSO Plan of technical means of security of a military unit

You are here: Reporting

The main guiding documents for the organization of equipping and operating the technical equipment of military facilities. The main guiding documents for the organization of equipping and operating the technical means of military facilities are the Charter of the garrison and guard services of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation, the Charter of the garrison and guard services of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation, the Charter of the garrison and guard services of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation, the Charter of the garrison and guard services of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Approved by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation. Directive of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces 332/N/040-Sh 1998 On the categorization of military facilities of the RF Ministry of Defense Directive of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces 332/N/040-Sh 1998 On the categorization of military facilities of the RF Ministry of Defense Order of the RF Ministry of Defense .On measures to equip the facilities of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation with technical security equipment Order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. On measures to equip the facilities of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation with technical security equipment Departmental construction standards for equipping TSO facilities of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation (VSN–). Departmental construction standards for equipping technical equipment for facilities of the RF Ministry of Defense (VSN-). Directive of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces 31 of December 21, 1998. On measures to improve the organization of daily activities and combat training of troops (forces), ensuring law and order and military discipline, troop service and security of military service in the RF Armed Forces Directive of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces 31 of December 21, 1998 d. On measures to improve the organization of daily activities and combat training of troops (forces), ensuring law and order and military discipline, troop service and the safety of military service in the RF Armed Forces Order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation of the year On the organization of accounting, storage and issuance of small arms and ammunition, as well as engineering ammunition in the RF Armed Forces. Order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation of the year On the organization of accounting, storage and issuance of small arms and ammunition for them, as well as engineering ammunition in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. List of nomenclature of technical and technical equipment (CTSO), recommended for equipping military facilities of various categories. Approved by the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces in 1998. List of nomenclature of technical and technical equipment (CTSO) recommended for equipping military facilities of various categories. Approved by the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces in 1998. Guidelines for equipping RF Ministry of Defense facilities with technical means of security and their operation (ROE TSO RF Ministry of Defense-98) Guidelines for equipping RF Ministry of Defense facilities with technical means of security and their operation (ROE TSO RF Ministry of Defense-98)

Charter of garrison and guard services of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation, the Charter of the garrison and guard services of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation. Technical security means are used to increase the reliability of security of objects and reduce the number of guard personnel. Reliability of security of objects using TSO is achieved: - by the correct choice of the type of technical security means and their use in combination with engineering barriers; - the secrecy of the measures taken to install security equipment; - high quality installation, constant maintenance and monitoring of their condition; - vigilance and timeliness of actions of guard personnel when technical security means are activated

Order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on measures to equip the objects of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation with technical security means. Category I objects are equipped with: object-based TSO perimeter TSO, operating on at least two different physical principles; external and internal physical fences; technical means of surveillance. Category II objects are equipped with: perimeter TSO external physical fences with on-site TSO. Category III objects are equipped with: on-site TSO

Departmental construction standards for equipping TSO facilities of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation (VSN–) PSO OSO SSOI SOE TSO COURT STN TSP and TSV Defines general requirements for the equipment of military TSO facilities

Basic requirements for installing TSO on the perimeter of a protected object Fencing: – the distance between the rods is no more than 0.15 mm. - barbed wire no more than 0.15 mm. - height no more than 2 mm. Internal fencing - the number of threads is at least 10, the height is at least 2.0 meters. PSOs are installed: - on the outer fencing or separately; - 3 meters from the outer fence; - the distance between PSOs is no more than 5 meters. PCB: - width not less than 3 m; - loosening depth 0.2 m; - drainage structures with a diameter of 250 mm with metal gratings; - dirt road at least 4.0 meters. The squad path (equipment) is 0.75 meters wide at a distance of 3.0 meters from the PSO. Lighting: on individual poles no more than 6.5 meters high, illumination 0.5 lux. Observation towers at a distance from each other of no more than 600 meters, between guard posts no more than 200 meters. The distance between alarm buttons is no more than 200 meters.

Equipment and installation of safety equipment in protected objects (buildings, structures, premises, etc.) Object security equipment is installed: - on the windows of the first floor; - on the windows of special rooms; - in rooms for storing weapons and ammunition; - windows are blocked by sensors for opening and, if necessary, for breaking; - walls and partitions are blocked by sensors for a break in the wall; - areas and volumes of premises are protected by infrared, radio waves, etc. sensors with their installation inside these premises; - autonomous backup power supply sources must ensure power supply to the TSO for 24 hours in standby mode and at least 3 hours in “Alarm” mode

Departmental construction standards for equipping TSO facilities of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation (VSN–) subsection Name WindowsDoors Partitions Volume Safes, cabinets 1 Weapons warehouses, military storage facilities, etc. Warehouses for storing material assets Money storage rooms Weapons storage room Accounting room Electronic equipment premises Premises Automatic telephone exchanges Pharmacy premises Premises for storing narcotic and toxic substances First aid stations Special equipment garages General purpose garages Shops Command office premises-+--+ List of premises, buildings and structures to be equipped with special equipment

Directive of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces 31 of December 21, 1998. On measures to improve the organization of daily activities and combat training of troops (forces), ensuring law and order and military discipline, troop service and security of military service in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation Directive of the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces 31 of 21 December 1998 On measures to improve the organization of daily activities and combat training of troops (forces), ensuring law and order and military discipline, troop service and the safety of military service in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation defines the basic requirements for equipping places for storing weapons and ammunition defines the basic requirements on equipping parks

Basic requirements for equipping TSO parks Warning signs are installed on external fencing and gates. In places where weapons and ammunition for them are located on vehicles, object detection means are installed. Signals from detection equipment are output to the control panel of the park duty officer and the chief of the guard. The entrance gates (gates) of storage facilities with equipment are equipped with technical security equipment. Technical security means are installed on the inside of the fence or along its top.

Order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation of the year On the organization of accounting, storage and issuance of small arms and ammunition for them, as well as engineering ammunition in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Requirements for the equipment of weapons storage places; warehouses with weapons and ammunition on the territory of parks, in the warehouse zone, are fenced with a double fence with a PSO; the design of the TSO must ensure reliable operation when the storage places are opened; if the wiring is damaged, the storage places for weapons and ammunition are equipped with standard TSO, equipped with basic and backup power sources ensure the issuance of a sound and light signal when the door is opened and do not have a blocking device to turn off the signal.

List of nomenclature of TSO (CTSO) recommended for equipping military facilities of various categories. Approved by the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces in 1998. List of nomenclature of TSO (CTSO) recommended for equipping military facilities of various categories. Approved by the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces in 1998. Military Object Category Type (class) TSO Name TSO Operating principle First PSOProtvaRadio beam RLD-94 Radio beam two-position CrocusRadio beam RIF-RLRadio beam Lena-2 (RutaSHF SOS-1** Triboelectric Dolphin-MVibration TSNVikontTV video monitoring system KBK IMSTelevision video monitoring system OSOKonus-3MDtwo-position microwave Konus- 3MS Konus-4P Don-MODone-position microwave RIF-KRL2-position radio beam TentRadio wave single-position

Military Object Category Type (class) TSO Name TSO Operating principle Second PSOPion-TM-1V Two-position radio beam Lemonnik Vibration Ledum Vibration RIF-RL Two-position radio beam Lawn Radiotechnical Uran-MR Radio wave OSOSMV-15 Microwave DT 4201 T DT 4351 T DT 4 501 T Combined (Microwave+IR) Gran-2Surface (for a break) piezoelectric Photon-2, -4MI Infrared SMK-3 IO-102, IO-303 (Window-4, -5) VK-1 Magnetic contact SSOIRubezh-07 Microprocessor universal control system Rubikon-2 Security alarm control device

Military Object Category Type (class) TSO Name TSO Operating principle Third OSOSMV-15 Microwave DT 4201 T DT 4351 T DT 4501 T Combined (microwave + IR) Gran-2 Surface (break-proof) piezoelectric Photon-2, -4Minfrared SMK-3 IO- 102,IO-303 (Window-4,-5)VK-1 Magnetic contact SirenInfrasonic SSOIRubezh-07Microprocessor-based universal control system Focus-SMSecurity control panel OrbitaSecurity control panel

Guidelines for equipping facilities of the RF Ministry of Defense with technical security equipment and their operation (ROE TSO RF Ministry of Defense-98) general rules for the intended use, maintenance, repair and storage of technical security equipment in peacetime. organization of training (retraining) of specialists in the use and operation of TSO. responsibilities of officials for organizing equipment and operation; the procedure for equipping the facilities of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation with technical security means and organizing their operation;

Management bodies for equipping military facilities TSO Directorate of military service and security of military service General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation General customer TSO -12 Main Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation (396 UZPV) TSO customers - management bodies for equipping and operating TSO of types of armed forces, branches of the military, military districts (fleets), main and central departments of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Consumers TSO-units, military units and subunits

Basic documents and initial data for planning the equipping of military facilities with TSO Orders and directives of higher military command bodies The decision of the commander (commander, chief) on equipping military facilities with TSO objects of category I - decisions of the commanders-in-chief (commanders) of the branches of the Armed Forces (arms, military districts and fleets) ), as well as the heads of the main and central departments, objects of category II - by the decision of the commander of the formation; objects of category III - by the decision of the commander of the formation (military unit) Actual data on the equipment of military installations of TSO and their condition. Decision of the commander (commander, chief) on assigning military installations the appropriate category objects of category I - by decisions of the commanders-in-chief (commanders) of the branches of the Armed Forces (arms, military districts and fleets), as well as heads of main and central departments objects of category II - by the decision of the commander of the formation; objects of category III - by the decision of the commander of the formation (military unit)

Categorization of objects of a military unit Actual data on the equipment of military facilities with TSO and their condition Long-term plan for equipping the TSO of the facility Security and defense plan, operation of the access system, algorithms for guard actions, instructions Certificate of verification of the state of equipment and operation of the TSO of a military unit Certificate-report on the presence and condition of TSO Planning for equipping TSO facilities Analysis of threats and patterns of intruders Collection of data on the presence and condition of TSO Analysis of the security system List of protected objects subject to TSO equipment Title lists of capital construction and repair Proposals for equipping military unit facilities with TSO Proposal for organizing the security of military units using TSO Solution for equipping TSO security facilities

Design preparation of equipping military facilities of TSO Development of design documentation Examination of technical and working design List of protected objects Actual data on equipping a military unit of TSO Standard design solutions ETD for TSO Carried out: objects of category I - by the customer of TSO, in agreement with the General. The customer of TSO for objects of category II, III - the customer of TSO Ground: Decision to equip a military unit with TSO Order of the military unit commander to organize equipment by the forces of the military unit Commander (commander, chief) Development of a technical and working design Approved part (explanatory note, estimate) Detailed documentation (working drawings, applications) Approval of the technical and working design

Supply of troops (forces) TSO Reason: Decision to equip a military unit of TSO Determination of the need for a military unit of TSO Approved technical and working project Approved by the customer TSO Issued by customers of TSO Central logistics bases of the customer TSO Central logistics bases of the general customer TSO Transport organizations Certificate of acceptance of TSO Invoice receipt of material resources Application for receiving TCO Order for receiving TCO Receipt of TCO Accounting for TCO at the unit warehouse Issuance of TCO for construction and installation work

Construction and installation work on equipping Solution for equipping the military unit with technical equipment Construction and installation work Commissioning work Acceptance of technical equipment into operation Order of the commander of the military unit to equip the technical equipment Approved by technical and technical support Work plan Certificate of acceptance of the technical equipment into operation Order of the commander of the military unit on commissioning of the technical equipment into operation Test plan Engineering and preparatory work Autonomous tests Integrated tests Installation work

Starting from the time when the first threat to a person appeared, the need to protect him from these threats appears. And the type of property.
Fences near communities, fortresses and weak points of gates (latches, locks, window bars.)
Each ruler created his own service - security, secret police, customs, jailers, Cossacks, army.
Also with the development SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TSO is also developing
The geese that saved Rome, the nomads pulled tripwires, hedgehogs to stop the cavalry.
With the advent of electricity, a new direction appeared - the simplest contact sensors; in World War 1, the first electrolyzed barrier was used.
In the USSR, the main development came from the NKVD and the Red Army, then the KGB and VV, FSB and GUIN (Ministry of Justice).

1935 - Research Institute for Communications Technology of the Intelligence Directorate of the Red Army was created (A.I. Gurvich)
1939 - The Institute of Operational Technology (V.S. Chetverikov) became part of the 5th Directorate of NPOs
March 15, 1946 - By decree of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR, the All-Russian Research Institute of Television (VNIIT, Leningrad) was formed to develop television equipment operating in the standard 625 lines, 25 frames per second (first director P.V. Shmakov)
July 1947 - VNII Television was transformed into NII-380, whose responsibilities included the creation of surveillance and control systems (director Seleznev A.A.)
May 18, 1962 - Decree on the introduction of technical security means.
1963 — Laboratory 36 was formed as part of the All-Russian Research Institute of Chemical Technology, which was entrusted with the development of technical security equipment (TSF)
1964 - Serial production of the GAMMA station apparatus, electromechanical EMD sensors, infrared sensors LUCH-1, capacitive sensors ED-1 began in the system of the Ministry of Medium Machine Building
1965 — A TSO group was created in department 4 of the SKB Penza Instrument-Making Plant (PPZ)
February 8, 1965 — Resolution “On improving the organization of security of enterprises, institutions and organizations.” He also created the Central Research Institute of Fire Defense of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs, which was entrusted with the development of security alarm equipment.
1967 - 1968 - Serial production of the first perimeter detection devices was launched - capacitive (TOR and SIGMA), radio-beam (ELLIPS and VECTOR), indoor sensors - ROMB-K4, KONUS, DUZ, information collection and processing equipment GAMMA-2
1968 - SNPO Eleron was entrusted with the development of security equipment and systems for the needs of the KGB and the USSR Ministry of Defense
1968 - Special departments were created on the basis of the laboratories of VNIIHT and PPZ (O.A. Stolyarov, A.V. Kabatov) with the aim of developing unobtrusive, reliable alarm systems for protecting the state border, closed areas, perimeters of objects, premises and buildings
1969 — A group was created to deal with the organization and conduct of work in the nuclear industry aimed at countering foreign technical intelligence (N.B. Kozlov)
1971 - A Special Design Bureau (SKB) was formed on the basis of the special department of VNIIHT (A.I. Belonosov)
1971 - 1975 - Information collection and processing systems of the TRASSA family and access control systems of the SECTOR family were developed
1975 — Beginning of serial production of the capacitive sensor for protecting perimeters RADIAN
1976 - By decree of the country's leadership, the Ministry of Medium Machinery was determined to be the parent organization for the creation of TSOs and equipping them with KGB facilities and the state border. A Special Technical Department (STU) was created (E.T. Mishin)
1977 - On the basis of SKB, the All-Union Scientific Research Institute of Physical Instruments (VNIIFP) (A.I. Belonosov) was created, the special department of the PPZ in October 1977 was transformed into an independent Special Design and Technology Bureau (SKTB) (L.N. Dmitrievsky), transformed , later, in NIKIRET
1978 — A textbook for higher military schools of the Ministry of Internal Affairs “Technical means of security” was published
April 5, 1978 - The Voronezh secondary police school of the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs was opened, specializing in training specialists for private security. In 1992, it was transformed into the Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, where specialists for private security are trained at the radio engineering faculty.
1982 - 1983 - The development of alarm systems OCEAN and ALTAI for the protection of border sections was completed, including detection means based on capacitive, inductive and vibroacoustic principles
1980 - 1984 - Development of the PION detection device was completed. ARSENAL Plant, Tula
1983 - 1985 - Development of the LENA-2 (RUTA) detection device was completed. MOLNIYA Plant, Moscow
1986 -The development of the detection device RADIAN - M PO “NORTH” was completed, Novosibirsk
1988 — Creation of the Research Center for Computer Security (NITSKB) as part of the Central Research Institute of EISU of the USSR Ministry of Defense Industry
1989 - On the basis of STU, VNIIFP, NIKIRET, the enterprises "Dedal" (Dubna) and "Lepton" (Lermontov) the State Enterprise "Special Research and Production Association "Eleron" (SE SNPO "Eleron") was created
1990 — NITSKB is separated from TsNIIEISU into an independent research and production small state enterprise for the protection of information and objects of NITSKB
1990-1991 — Escort-Center CJSC is spun off from the Eleron association (SE SNPO Eleron) and created
1990 — The Research Center “Security” was created on the basis of the Research Center for Clinical Design
1992 — Transformation of the Research Center for Design and Design into the Security Center, the leading scientific and technical organization of Roscomoboronprom for the integrated protection of information and objects
1992 — On the basis of the installation and commissioning department of SNPO Eleron, the Center for the Implementation of Security Equipment was created, and on the basis of the PD ITR department, the Center for Integrated Security of Information (TsKBI)
1992 — In different cities of Russia, enterprises for the production of SOI based on PVEM “Dozor” (JSC IPP “Ista-Systems”), “Rubezh” (NPF “Sigma-Integrated Systems”), “Vista” (JSC “MZEP”) are organized , “Kodos” (NPK “SoyuzSpetsAvtomatika”), “Orion” (NVP “Bolid”).
1993 - Eleron was designated as the lead organization for the development, manufacture, supply of technical means and security systems and the implementation of design, installation and commissioning work on equipping security means and systems of particularly important government facilities
1994 — In SE SNPO Eleron, a body accredited by the State Standard of Russia for certification of physical protection equipment and complexes of technical security equipment (ROSS RU.0011.11.002) and a Testing Center (IC NIKIRET) was created for the right to conduct certification tests
1994 - A number of private companies are created to create various technical security equipment: Yumirs CJSC, Security Equipment CJSC, Argus Spektor OJSC, ELTA CJSC, SPEC CJSC, PKP OMEGA LTD, REFLECTOR JSC ,
1994 — The AIMS department for training TSO specialists is opened at PSU.
1995 - By order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation of March 21, 1995, on the basis of the Design and Technological Institute of Automation and Mechanization of Production (PTIAM) of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, the Center for Engineering and Technical Support (CITO) of the GUIN of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia was created.
2000 - Closed is organized on the material basis of reinforced concrete products

Joint Stock Company "Center for Special Engineering Structures of the Research and Design Institute of Radioelectronic Engineering" (CJSC "TseSIS NIKIRET") was established by the Federal State Unitary Enterprise "Research Institute of Physical Measurements" (Russian Aviation Space Agency) and the Federal State Unitary Enterprise "Research and Design Institute of Radioelectronic Engineering" (Federal Atomic Energy Agency).
Currently in Russia there are three accredited Testing Centers for the right to conduct ITSO certification tests - NIKIRET Research Center, Okhrana Research Center, and the Ministry of Justice Research Center MTSITO. The development of ITSO is a knowledge-intensive production and requires large expenses.
In order to separate TSO and engineering, our enterprise was created in 2000, the backbone of which included specialists from NIKIRET, ON START.
My general director Yu.G. has already spoken about our achievements, I wanted to talk about the products we produce.
History of Metol release. SOS-1 Tensor
Swallowtail 2002
Vocational school

Complexes of engineering and technical means of physical protection of the perimeter

In order to optimize the design of ITSO complexes, it is advisable to identify “typical” or frequently encountered security objects and determine the required level of their protection. To do this, it is necessary to conditionally divide objects by importance from the standpoint of ensuring their safety. The classification is based on the importance of objects in the production and technological process system and the nature or extent of possible damage that may be caused in the event of malicious actions of violators.
The security system (physical protection system) of an object of any category (degree of importance) is a set of organizational measures, a set of engineering and technical means and security forces.

When considering barriers as an element of a complex of engineering and technical security means (TESPS), it is necessary to take into account that the most effective, in contrast to reinforced concrete structures, according to experts from a number of manufacturing companies, are “soft” barriers made of various metal meshes.
Despite their apparent reliability, reinforced concrete fences require a number of additional strengthening measures, for example: equipping the top with a canopy barrier that protects against climbing.
A comparative analysis showed that a reinforced concrete fence, taking into account installation work, is 2-3 times more expensive than a metal mesh fence, without taking into account the installation of additional engineering and technical means of perimeter security on the fence.
The obvious advantages of metal mesh fencing are:
the possibility of monitoring by security forces and means of optical-electronic surveillance of the territory adjacent to the fence from the outside;
relatively small volumes of construction and installation work;
ease of equipping with technical security means;
low cost of the product (compared to reinforced concrete fencing).

On the other hand, the specifics of a number of oil and gas complex facilities (main pipelines, healthcare facilities, gas treatment facilities, booster compressor stations, gas stations, etc.) with fairly extended perimeters, located in different climatic zones of Russia, dictate special requirements for the types of barriers, are distinguished by the severity of the climate and are characterized by:
wide range of temperature changes throughout the year (from - 50 to + 50 ° C);
large amounts of precipitation, especially in winter (snow level up to several meters);
significant air humidity and the effects of salt (sea) fog, combined with sudden temperature changes, leading in winter to the formation of thick layers of icing on load-bearing structures and structures;

Under these conditions, equipment that has proven itself when operating in the European part of Russia and other regions with a more temperate climate, under extreme conditions, is not always able to ensure adequate reliability and durability of its operation at acceptable operating costs. Therefore, solving the problem of equipping facilities located in regions with harsh climatic conditions requires a specific approach and special technical security means.
As an optimal way to solve this problem, it is proposed to use at such objects a metal barrier of a special design (all-climate design), the fabric of which is made on the basis of a grid with steel rods with a diameter of 5 mm (MAKHAON - standard system, manufactured by CJSC TseSIS NIKIRET). Barrier height up to 5 m
The possibility of overcoming this barrier by climbing with the help of available means exists, but it becomes unlikely when the structure is reinforced from above with an additional obstacle in the form of a canopy barrier (KZR) based on an ACL spiral.

Canopy barriers produced by TseSIS NIKIRET have several modifications for mounting on different types of barriers and provide additional barrier functions:
increasing the height of an engineering structure;
the ability to install various types of technical detection equipment;
the possibility of combining KZR structures through the use of various types of barbed wire, reinforced barbed tape, and welded mesh fabrics.
It should be noted that the use of canopy barriers based on reinforced razor tape on existing fences and (or) the placement of ACL rollers on the ground near it is the fastest and most effective improvement to the perimeter fence. This design is most attractive from the point of view of the “efficiency – cost” criterion.

An essential part of the fence is the foundation. Depending on the type of soil, the following designs are possible:
concreting the fence supports installed in previously drilled holes (for soils of the 2nd group);
foundation block in the form of a “shoe” on rocky soils with anchor bolts for fastening the support;
piles – foundation on permafrost;
screw supports (for any type of soil except rocky).
The main advantage of metal screw supports over other types of foundations is the ability to install them manually. The cost-effectiveness of the product and the manufacturability of installation lead to a reduction in the installation time of foundations.
When screwing, the soil is compacted, which explains the high load-bearing capacity of the screw supports. Another advantage is its use on slopes, near large trees, on uneven surfaces and where landscaping work has already been completed (lawns, etc.).

The fence, in addition to the direct security function of creating a physical barrier at the border of the territory, acts as a platform for technical detection means, video surveillance systems, lighting and other auxiliary equipment used in conjunction with it.
To create integrated security systems for large turnkey facilities: development of a security concept, design, installation, service, training of customer personnel and including the development of security system components
own mass production. CJSC "TseSIS NIKIRET" cooperates widely with developers of technical security equipment (TSF). In Russia, the undisputed leadership in the development of perimeter detection means belongs to FSUE SNPO Eleron, FSUE NIKIRET - a branch of FSUE FSPC "PO Start" named after. M.V. Protsenko, JSC "Yumirs", JSC "Algont" and also attracts the scientific teaching staff of Penza State University and Penza State University of Architecture and Construction.

Countering the threat of a terrorist attack using vehicles. Anti-ramming devices.

When committing terrorist acts, the real danger is posed by terrorists in vehicles; the ramming direction is considered to be the entrance gate to the facility or perimeter sections with terrain suitable for vehicle passage.
One of the ways to counter this threat is to install a reliable physical obstacle to the breakthrough of wheeled vehicles or railway vehicles.
Linear sections of the perimeter can be closed with standard means (ditch, trench, reinforced concrete blocks, etc.), then anti-ram devices (PTU) are used to protect the entrances to the facility; their use is an integral component of measures to protect objects of high importance.

Vocational schools presented on the Russian market can be divided into two groups - stationary and mobile.
According to their intended purpose, mobile devices are characterized by quick delivery, assembly, and installation at the required passage width, such as the “Diana” or “Ezh-M” forced vehicle stopping device. That is, a group of terrorists who have broken through to a certain depth with the help of a car, although deprived of means of transportation, are able to continue the operation. In this case, additional operational security actions to localize the terrorists are required.
Stationary anti-ram devices can be divided into barriers:
– barrier type;
– retractable anti-ram posts (bollards);
- anti-ram gates.
Each of the above anti-ramming devices is designed to withstand various shock loads and has positive and negative sides. All of them are managed funds. Control can be carried out remotely either from a stationary post (checkpoint) or from a key fob via radio channel.
Let's consider barrier-type anti-ramming devices.
The principle of operation of an anti-ram barrier device is to quickly block the roadway with a moving barrier boom. The movement of the barrier boom can be carried out both in the vertical lifting-lowering plane and in the horizontal one. The disadvantage of moving the boom in a horizontal plane is that it increases the protected area. A common disadvantage of barrier-type devices is that they only block the path of moving wheeled vehicles. For foot terrorists, it is not an obstacle to overcome and capture it for the purpose of opening it. Therefore, the barrier anti-ram device must be constantly located in the security control zone. The impact energy directed at the PTU is perceived and completely extinguished by the barrier boom and the supporting ground metal structure, rigidly connected to
calculated reinforced concrete foundation located under the road surface.
Next in the proposed classification of stationary vocational schools are road blockers (bollards). Bollards are mounted at a distance of no more than 1.5 m from each other. Structurally, a bollard is a metal pole made of a thick-walled pipe that extends above the surface of the roadway. The diameter of the column and the thickness of the wall are included in the structure depending on the purpose and the perceived load. Installation of bollards requires the obligatory opening of the road surface. Under the roadway there is a concrete structure with a base box for lowering the bollard when the driveway is opened. To lift the bollard above the road, electromechanical, hydraulic, pneumatic drives or, with a relatively small mass (up to 100 kg), gas piston shock absorbers can be used.
One of the advantages of using retractable poles is the ability to block ground pedestrian zones and squares bordering administrative buildings or hotels from the breakthrough of terrorist vehicles. They have an attractive aesthetic appearance.
The disadvantage of safety poles is their constant maintenance in the autumn, spring and winter. This is the removal of dirt, snow mass and icing from places of contact with the road surface. In most cases, installation of a drainage system and a heating system is necessary.
To eliminate these shortcomings, our company proposes to cover the territory of automatic transmissions and railway transmissions with a frameless structure, which will significantly increase the time for a violator to overcome the restricted zone.
Anti-ram gates differ from the above ones primarily in that they carry two important main functions. They not only stop a moving wheeled vehicle, but are also a serious physical obstacle in the path of pedestrian intruders. The anti-ram power unit, which stops the vehicle, is located at the bottom of the gate leaf and absorbs the impact load of the car frame. The upper part of the gate leaf restrains the inertially moving frame part. Anti-ram gates are more metal-intensive than other means and require higher installation, commissioning and operating costs. Structurally thought out gates that can withstand severe shock loads may have an advantage when selected for a specific object.

Results of work on the design and implementation of technical equipment produced by CJSC "TseSIS NIKIRET" at important and particularly important facilities.

When developing vocational schools, computer technologies were actively used in design and technological preparation of production. For example, the three-dimensional solid modeling system "KOMPAS - 3 D", which allows you to implement the classic process of three-dimensional parametric design - from idea to model, from model to design documentation. To calculate and confirm the strength characteristics of the product, a set of SCAD programs was used. Calculations were also carried out using the method of mathematical modeling of impact load. The methods and technologies used made it possible to solve the design problems with sufficient accuracy and ensure the strength characteristics of the product. Leading specialists from Penza State University (PSU) and Penza State University of Architecture and Construction (PSUAS) were involved in the work to determine and confirm the strength characteristics.
Based on the results of operation, development of manufacturing technology and analysis, the product was modernized in 2007. The result of the modernization was an increase in reliability, an increase in service life by almost 3 times, which was confirmed by service life tests carried out by CJSC TseSIS NIKIRET. And in mid-2008, a new modification of PTU was developed (ROSS certificate of conformity
RU.OS02.N00695 No. 0607156 dated 08/15/2008 issued by OS TSO NTSC "ATOMZASCHITAINFORM").
The operating experience of PTUs installed at facilities, including Sheremetyevo International Airport, facilities of OJSC Lukoil, the Navy base on the Kamchatka Peninsula, Kola Nuclear Power Plant, Kalinin Nuclear Power Plant, Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Plant, Novovoronezh Nuclear Power Plant and facilities in other industries, has shown them to be quite high level of technical and design development.
Today, more than 150 anti-ramming devices produced by TseSIS NIKIRET CJSC are successfully operating at the CUSTOMER’s facilities.
At the same time in 2008-2009. The company has developed and mass-produced:
—vandal-resistant automatic barrier, designed to regulate traffic as part of an access control and management system (ACS). Features: resistance to ramming impact from a vehicle weighing 2 tons at speeds up to 20 km/h, operating mode – intensive (lifetime 1,000,000 cycles). The barrier boom is replaceable and made of a standard metal profile.
— mechanical barrier, designed to control and manage entry and exit to a protected area. Features: reliable and easy to use. The barrier boom is balanced by a gas spring.

Principles for selecting a supplier of engineering and technical protective equipment

In perimeter security systems, the construction of the fence itself can account for the bulk of the cost of protecting the facility as a whole. Separate contracts for the supply and construction of fencing and for the installation of technical means of perimeter security may become a source of difficulties. If it turns out that the already installed system does not meet the requirements, the customer will find himself in the position of a hostage between two or even three performers. Therefore, when building security systems, it is necessary to clearly understand the importance of limiting the choice of equipment only to systems that have passed rigorous joint tests and demonstrated reliable joint operation under all possible external conditions. A complete supply of fencing systems and security sensors will also allow you to avoid the undesirable procedure of formal transfer of the fencing by the manufacturer or construction organization to the supplier of technical security equipment.

Procedures for selecting a supplier of engineered protective equipment usually involve a tender for technical specifications. Naturally, the owner of the property is interested in thoroughly testing the product before purchasing it. The verification, of course, is best carried out by the facility owner’s own engineering departments, or, in extreme cases, by an independent testing organization (“independent” ones are quite difficult to find, and today, apparently, impossible).
Currently, FSUE PA START has maintained a unique accredited test site where tests of all types of products are carried out jointly with CJSC TseSIS NIKIRET.
In collaboration with facility specialists, TseSIS NIKIRET CJSC is ready to explore the issues of joint use of various engineering means and security alarm systems, verify the durability of system elements operated outdoors, assess the labor intensity of installation and maintenance work, take a training course in installation and maintenance, and assess maintainability complex planned for installation.
Particular attention should be paid to system maintenance. There are scheduled preventative and routine maintenance. Issues of determining the cost of these works to evaluate the complex as a whole should be taken into account when ordering it. Based on
For example, an expensive galvanized fence is preferable to a cheap painted one, because the cost of painting fences every year exceeds the entire savings on purchase.

Reliability and high tactical and technical characteristics of security systems produced by TseSIS NIKIRET are ensured on the basis of:
— analysis of the vulnerability of the object;
— a powerful testing base - an accredited test site of the Test Center, equipped with modern instrumentation, means of objective assessment of climatic conditions, tools and equipment;
— the presence of highly qualified specialists from design and engineering services, ready to provide standard design solutions, develop conceptual and detailed designs or a complete design-assemblable system, consisting of a set of technical means and subsystems optimized for functional properties;
— the presence of an installation organization and a staff of qualified specialists carrying out construction, installation, warranty and post-warranty service;
— solutions to fundamental organizational and systemic issues of information security, data protection when involving third parties, protection of confidential information.

A set of technical security equipment for ships and vessels of the Navy

The TSO complex is successfully operated at more than ten naval installations

The most promising way to create a TSO (CTSO) complex that meets the requirements of the RD of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and the Navy and performs security functions in ship-specific conditions is to build it on the basis of a ship monitoring system (SMS) developed by SKB Energia.

This system has been supplied to Navy ships and vessels for about 10 years and contains all the necessary practical-tested components to solve security problems. The construction of CTSO is carried out on the basis of the element-component base and specialized SCM software by means of their corresponding functional addition (Fig. 1). In particular, on the basis of the blocks and devices included in the SCM system for monitoring ship premises, open parts of decks and the situation near the sides, the function of television surveillance of security objects is implemented. The functions of object detection and control and access control to protected premises are carried out on the basis of the equipment of the access control system for general ship premises included in SCM. The control system for bypassing premises allows you to perform the function of monitoring the bypass of security facilities by guard and security groups. Uninterruptible power supply to the CTSO is provided by the system of the same name from SCM.

Similar to SCM, CTSO for ships and vessels of the Navy is built on the principle of a distributed local computer network and is structurally divided into hardware and software.

The hardware of the CTSO includes:

– data acquisition equipment;

– equipment for processing, controlling, recording and displaying information;

– uninterruptible power supply equipment;

– communication lines.

Data acquisition equipment includes:

– in-compartment and deck digital TV cameras KT-292 and KT-570, performing the functions of technical surveillance equipment;

– door position sensors DPD-1, DPD-2, performing the functions of object detection devices for heated and unheated premises;

– SCh-1 readers, which, together with electromechanical locks, perform access control and management functions.

The equipment for processing, controlling, recording and displaying information includes:

– control and switching units BUK-5, performing switching and server functions;

– information display units BOI-2, BOI-M2, which collect, process and display information and control the CTSO operators.

If the main power supply disappears, the operability of the system is ensured by UBP-2000 uninterruptible power supply devices.

The CTSO software is built on a modular principle, allowing it to take into account the specific structure of the installed hardware and provide a solution to the following set of tasks:

– simultaneous processing of information from TV cameras, sensors and readers;

– organization of console modes, separate and combined with general ship control systems, of the CTSO and its constituent devices;

– organization of information exchange over the network with associated systems;

– providing information about the location of the alarm situation in text and graphic form;

– diagnostics of CTSO hardware;

– archiving of video information and text messages for the required time, including messages about the operation of the complex as a whole.

Figure 2. Structure of CTSO, built on the basis of SCM.

The TSO complex, built on the SCM basis, allows it to perform control functions both separately and independently from the general ship security systems, and in interaction with them. In the first case, for some types of ships and vessels, the control bodies (workstation of the CTSO operator) are located in a specially designated room, and the functions of the operator are performed by a full-time person of the security unit. In the second case, security functions are performed in conjunction with other security functions (ship monitoring, emergency prevention, combating survivability, etc.). At such facilities, the control bodies of the CTSO are located in common premises with the controls of other systems, and the functions of the CTSO operator are combined with other functions performed by persons on duty (watch) service. At the same time, it seems necessary to ensure software and hardware compatibility of the CTSO with general ship security systems and, above all, with the ship monitoring system. This property allows the CTSO operator:

– have the most complete information about the safety situation at the facility;

– promptly change the level of security depending on the current situation;

– use the capabilities of general ship systems in solving security problems (for example, use fire monitors to contain threats on the upper deck), etc.

The structure of the CTSO in a level representation is shown in Fig. 2.

The main advantage of creating a CTSO based on SCM is a significant reduction in the costs of developing a new type of military equipment in the form of R&D, testing and acceptance for supply.

I came across an interesting story that illuminates some of the details of protecting our border with Donbass.
A guy from Rostov-on-Don served in the Somalia unit from December 2014 to March 2015. Tired of the hardships of service, I decided to go home and unwind. At the same time, he took with him a machine gun and several hundred rounds of ammunition for it.

*****
The firearms he had - an AKMS-74 assault rifle and ammunition - 525 rounds of 5.45 mm caliber Kamenkovich Yu.S. I decided to take them with me to Rostov-on-Don in order to preserve them. Kamenkovich Yu.S. understood that according to the established procedure through the checkpoint, he would not be able to cross the State Border and enter the Russian Federation due to the need to move firearms and ammunition to Russia. He decided to bypass the checkpoint across the state border “Novoazovsk” - “Veselo-Voznesenka” in order to avoid customs clearance and detection of weapons and ammunition.

For these purposes, Kamenkovich Y.S. arrived at the southern bus station of Donetsk, Ukraine, where he found a taxi for 8,000 rubles to Rostov-on-Don. Kamenkovich Yu.S. I put the machine gun with cartridges in my backpack in the trunk of the car. Arriving at the Novoazovsk checkpoint from the Ukrainian side, Kamenkovich Yu.S. asked K to stop, left his documents and phone in the car, told K to wait for him near the cafe, next to the Veselo-Voznesenka checkpoint on the territory of the Russian Federation, without informing him of his intentions to commit a crime - to cross the border illegally. Kamenkovich Yu.S. I left my passport, military ID and phone number in K’s car to confirm my intentions to travel with K further to Rostov-on-Don and pay for the fare. After this, Kamenkovich Y.S. I took a backpack with a machine gun and ammunition from the trunk and walked on foot to the left from the Veselo-Voznesenka checkpoint through the forest belt. Having walked about 180 meters, Kamenkovich Yu.S. I saw a ditch dug along the State Border, about one and a half meters deep and about a meter wide, as well as a fence with barbed wire, overcame the said ditch and climbed over the fence along with a backpack containing the above-mentioned Kalashnikov assault rifle and 525 rounds of 5.45 mm caliber. He crossed the state border of the Russian Federation at approximately 21:40 on 03/06/2015. Kamenkovich Yu.S. traveled through the territory of the Russian Federation for about 800 meters and was stopped by the border patrol.
*****

And this is why he got caught:

*****
response from the Federal Security Service of Russia for the Rostov region from... ..., according to which, when crossing the state border, Kamenkovich Yu.S. seismic detection means were triggered - seismic sensors of the reconnaissance and signaling complex "Radiobarrier - MF" No. K782 part 5-9, No. K782 part 5-10, No. K782 part 5-11, installed in the ground in the direction of the settlement. Novoazovsk, Donetsk region of Ukraine - x. Maksimov, Neklinovsky district, Rostov region, Russian Federation.
*****

"Radiobarrier-MF" is a modification of the "Radiobarrier" perimeter security alarm system.
Principles of work in pictures:

The basis for constructing a security system is RS-U, operating in the mode of a seismic detection device. Each RS-U contains a micro-power processor that selects a useful signal characteristic of human steps at the level of seismic noise.

To ensure the secrecy of the RS-U installation, it should be buried in the ground to a depth of 20...30 cm, also ensuring its complete concealment. Properly installed in the ground and connected to the battery, the RS-U forms a circular detection zone around itself. Under normal conditions (distance from busy highways, railways or city limits is at least 1 km), the radius of the detection zone is at least 40 meters. In conditions of moderate seismic noise, the radius of the detection zone can reach 100 meters.

To control the perimeter, several RS-Us are located on the ground in one or several lines. To create a continuous security line, the detection zones of adjacent detection means must overlap. As a rule, to create a single line with a length of 1 kilometer, from 12 to 18 RS-U are required.
All RS-U located on the ground form a single radio network, within which service radio exchange and transmission of alarm messages are carried out. After connecting the power, the RS-U is automatically registered in the radio network. Transmission of alarm messages from detection equipment is carried out to all portable receivers registered in the radio network (KPR) and to the operator console (PORT). If there is no direct radio visibility between the triggered RS-U and the receiving KOPR or PORT, the information is relayed along the optimal route through other RS-Us.

Brochure with performance characteristics and typical solutions for using the complex on the manufacturer’s website - radiobarrier.com/gallery/broshyura-rb.pd f

The developer also aimed at detecting weapons on a person, but I have not yet found information about the implementation of this idea:

Magnetometric detection device of concentrated type (detection range of an AK-74 type assault rifle is up to 4 meters).

Recent Posts from This Journal

The Kremlin condemned police brutality at rallies

Life is getting better: Indian astrologer predicted the exact end date of the crisis

What you should not say out loud if you receive a call from an unknown number

An ordinary employee of the Voskresensk enterprise owes the bank almost 2 billion rubles

Non-standard and very effective recipes from the pharmacy