On December 5, 1917, Decree No. 1 “On the Courts” appeared in the young country of the Soviets. At that time, the village of Nazarovo, Achinsk district, belonged to the West Siberian Territory. Based on the decree of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee “On the People's Court” of the RSFSR and the Announcement of the Achinsk District Military Revolutionary Committee of March 6, 1920, the People's Court of the village was formed. NAZAROVSKOE.

At that time, justice in Nazarovo was carried out by the following judges: Pavlov N.V., Filippov A.N., (20 30 years), Paramonov V.I., Andronov M.B.

In 1946 Nazarovo was renamed into a workers' settlement, the justice authorities began to be called the district court of Nazarovo, and since 1951. People's Court of Nazarovo.

December 25, 1961 The working settlement of Nazarovo was given the status of a city. From that time on, the court became known as the Nazarovsky City Court, and A. I. Obukhov was appointed chairman of the people’s court.

Place in the judicial system

In accordance with Article 4 of the Federal constitutional law dated December 31, 1996 N 1-FKZ "On judicial system Russian Federation", district courts belong to the courts of the system federal courts general jurisdiction, being lower level courts.

As a court of first instance, the district court hears all civil and criminal cases, with the exception of cases within the jurisdiction of higher courts and magistrates, as well as administrative cases within the jurisdiction of district courts, and cases of reinstatement. District courts, in particular, have jurisdiction over administrative cases of offenses entailing administrative punishment, which only a judge has the right to appoint, proceedings for which are carried out in the form administrative investigation; cases involving administrative expulsion outside the Russian Federation; cases brought to court by authorities and officials to whom the case was received.

In accordance with Article 21 1-FKZ, the district court is directly superior court in relation to magistrates operating in the territory of the relevant judicial district, it considers appeals against decisions of magistrates that have not entered into legal force.

To the chairman of the court
O.L. Rogovoy

The State Labor Inspectorate in the Krasnoyarsk Territory, in connection with the received complaint from N.S. Sitnikov, asks to inform you whether N.S. Sitnikov’s claim is pending. against ZAO Glyadenskoye, the essence of the claim, and what decision was made.
Please respond as quickly as possible, since the issue of conducting an inspection is being decided.

Chief State Labor Inspector L.D. Bondareva

In response to your appeal dated January 12, 2016, No. 24 RS 0037-89, we inform you that on November 25, 2015, the Nazarovo City Court considered civil case No. 2-2054/2015 on the claim of Nikolay Sergeevich Sitnikov against Glyadenskoye CJSC for the recovery of lost money wages. In satisfaction claims Nikolay Sergeevich Sitnikov’s application to CJSC Glyadenskoye was denied.

Judge E.A. Naumova

Court hearing on civil case your claim against Maxim Vladimirovich Cherkashin for the collection of debt, interest under the loan agreement, penalties was postponed until 14-00 hours on June 16, 2015. No later than the specified time, in advance you need to submit to the court the original receipt and loan agreement dated No. 00007 dated January 31. 2013, concluded with Cherkashin M.V.

Judge L.N. Frolenko

In response to your request dated June 16, 2014, I inform you that the statement of claim against Home Credit and Finance Bank LLC for the protection of consumer rights was received by the Nazarovo City Court on May 20, 2014.

Based on the ruling of the Nazarovsky City Court dated May 23, 2014, your statement of claim with all the documents attached to it was returned to the address you specified in the application (Verkhnyaya Chulymka village, Chulymskaya St., 27).

Nazarovo City Court
Judge T.V. Okhotnikova

I am the defense attorney for Ivan Aleksandrovich Mostovykh in the case of an administrative offense under Part 1. Art. 12.8 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation on a complaint against a decision of a magistrate judicial section № 104.
Due to the impossibility of personal appearance in Nazarovo and residence in Krasnoyarsk, please send me a certified copy of the decision of the Nazarovo City Court.
Previously, the resolution and decision were not served or sent to the defender.

In accordance with Art. 48 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, everyone is guaranteed the right to receive qualified legal assistance. In cases provided by law, legal assistance is provided free of charge.

For the provision of qualified legal assistance, we recommend that you contact lawyers or other persons who provide assistance on a professional basis.

Chairman of the court O.L. Rogova

Dear Denis Mikhailovich,

In response to your request to inform me of the date of the next court hearing after May 15, 2014, I inform you that about the time and place of the court hearing at 08:30 on May 19, 2014, you and your client – ​​Mostovykh I.A. were notified in person during the court hearing on May 15, 2014. Because after leaving the courtroom, subpoenas you did not receive them, on May 16, 2014 they were signed for transfer to you and I.A. Mostovykh. were presented to the Mostovs’ wife. You were also notified additionally by telephone message about the time of the court hearing on May 19, 2014. Due to failure to appear, the case of an administrative offense on May 19, 2014 was considered in your absence, a copy of the decision is sent to you by mail.

Judge T.V. Okhotnikova

Judge Khobovets
from Zaitsev Dmitry Vasilievich

I am sending a scanned copy of the payment order to your address. state duty for submission appeal according to Skvortsov’s claim against Mikhienko.

A scanned copy is attached to the application as an attached file.

To your appeal dated January 10, 2014, received by the Nazarovo City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory on January 14, 2014. No. 181 through the official website of the court on the Internet, about sending to the court a scanned copy of the receipt for payment of the state fee for filing an appeal in Skvortsov’s claim against Mikhienko, I inform you that the Nazarovsky City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory received it from D.V. Zaitsev. through the official website of the court on the Internet, a copy of the receipt for payment of the state fee in the amount of 200 rubles. In addition, the Nazarovo City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory received from D.V. Zaitsev. by mail the original check for payment of the state duty in the amount of 200 rubles.

Judge Khobovets Yu.A.

To the Collegium for Civil Cases of the Krasnoyarsk Regional Court
_______________________________________________
through the Nazarovo City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory
______________________________________________
plaintiff: Skvortsov Nikolay Vladimirovich
defendant: Mikhienko Alexey Viktorovich representative ZAYTSEV DMITRY VASILIEVICH
660049, Krasnoyarsk, Mira Ave., 57 of. 3-01
third party: Zaitsev Dmitry Vasilievich

A P E L L Y T ​​I O N A J A L O B A
addition to previously submitted
Having disagreed with the decision of the Nazarovsky City Court, the defendant Alexey Viktorovich Mikhienko and the third party Dmitry Vasilyevich Zaitsev filed an appeal. To the previously stated arguments about the unjustifiedness of the decision, we point out:
The court named Skvortsov Nikolay Vladimirovich and Skvortsov Vladimir Nikolaevich as co-plaintiffs in the case as persons who made the loan joint property in the amount of 30,000 euros to Alexey Viktorovich Mikhienko. During the consideration of the case, a third party and the defendant repeatedly stated that deadlines had been missed limitation period both by the original plaintiff Skvortsov N.V., (in the response to the claim) and the omission of the limitation period on the part of the second co-plaintiff Skvortsov Vladimir Nikolaevich. The agreement clearly establishes that the funds are joint property - and not a joint share (in which the share of each of the co-plaintiffs is not defined) by two persons are transferred to the defendant. That is, the court did not determine which of the co-plaintiffs and what share in common property belonged. Consequently, applying the grounds for refusing to satisfy the claims against Vladimir Nikolaevich Skvortsov, the court was obliged to terminate the proceedings in the case and in the claim of Nikolai Vladimirovich Skvortsov. If the court wanted to satisfy the claims, then the court was obliged to establish the share in the property of each of the co-plaintiffs. In addition, individuals who have their own joint ownership, not having it in the allocated part, do not have the consent of the co-owners to go to court independently without the consent of the co-owners.
Based on the above, I ask that the decision be cancelled, that the claims be denied in full.
December 23, 2013
Representative of the defendant (third party)________________________________D.V. Zaitsev

The script is directed by post

To your appeal dated December 23, 2013, containing the text of the addition to the previously filed appeal against the decision of the Nazarovsky City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory dated November 7, 2013 in a civil case brought by N.V. Skvortsov, V.N. Skvortsov. to Mikhienko A.V. on the collection of the amount of debt, interest for the use of others in cash, expenses for payment of services of a representative, state duty, received by the Nazarovo City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory on December 24, 2013 entrance. No. 2-38/13 through the official website of the court on the Internet, I inform you that this addition to the previously filed appeal against the above decision of the Nazarovsky City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory dated November 7, 2013 was not signed by D.V. Zaitsev. The addition to the previously filed appeal will be considered after it is received by the court with the signature of D.V. Zaitsev.

Chairman of the Nazarovo City Court O.L. Rogova

To the Collegium for Civil Cases
Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

plaintiff: BACHURIN NIKOLAY ALEXEEVICH BIRTH 09/23/1975
REGISTRATION KRASNOYARSK, SHCHERBAKOVA STREET BUILDING 16 SQ. 58

defendants: ZAITSEV DMITRY VASILIEVICH
KRASNOYARSK. STREET KOMMUNALNAYA. 6 kV. 187

ZAYTSEVA DIANA VLADIMIROVNA BIRTH 06/24/1972
REGISTERED: KRASNOYARSK ST. TOBOLSKAYA HOUSE 5 KV.442

The Kirov District Court of Krasnoyarsk refused to satisfy my claims against Diana Vladimirovna Zaitseva and Dmitry Vasilievich Zaitsev for recognition of my ownership of the car
LEXUS RX - 300 state registration plate E 305 XP 24 RUS:
An identification number(VIN) JTJHF10U200275874.
Name (vehicle type) CAR (ESTATE)
Vehicle category (A, B, C, D) “B”
The year of manufacture of the vehicle is NOT ESTABLISHED
Model, engine N 1 MZ - 1367793
Chassis (frame) N MISSING
Body (cabin) color BLUE
Engine power, l. With. (kW) 204 (150.04)
Engine displacement, cubic meters cm 2994
Engine type PETROL
Permitted maximum weight, kg 2995
Weight without load, kg 1720
Organization - vehicle manufacturer (country) TOYOTA MOTORS CORPORATION
Vehicle passport (series, number, date of issue): 24 KS 967787
Name of the organization that issued the passport MREO OGIBDD Department of Internal Affairs of KRASNOYARSK
Passport issue date: FEBRUARY 11, 2005
as well as oblige the defendant Zaitseva Diana Vladimirovna to remove the car LEXUS RX - 300 state registration plate E 305 XP 24 RUS with registration accounting, give me the car with the documents attached to it - a passport technical means and two sets of keys with an emmobilizer.
I consider the court’s decision not legal and unfounded; it based its decision only on the fact that the Nazarovo City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory imposed a ban on the implementation registration actions in relation to the said vehicle. Without recognizing the contract as invalid or fraudulent, the judge, making an unjust decision in advance, concludes that I am in criminal conspiracy with Zaitsev D.V. and I'm trying to exclude him from arrest controversial car. I only learned about the availability of the final decision on December 18, 2013 from the website of the Kirovsky District Court of Krasnoyarsk.
For reasons unknown to me, neither I nor my representative in fixed time the decision was not served in full; it was not sent to me by post or handed over to me.

Based on the above, I request:

1. Restore the deadline appeal decision of the Kirovsky District Court on my claim against D.V. Zaitseva. and Zaitsev D.V..
2. Give me a certified copy of the court decision, so that I can draw up a reasoned appeal based on all the arguments that the court provides in justifying its decision.
3. Cancel the decision of the Kirov RFU and issue a new decision with full satisfaction of my claims.
4. THE FINAL FORM OF THE APPEAL WILL BE FILED AFTER 30 DAYS FROM THE MOMENT OF THE OFFICIAL DELIVERY TO ME OF A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE COURT DECISION.

THE APPLICATION IS SENDED IN SCAN ELECTRONIC FORM TO THE WEBSITE OF THE KIROVSKY DISTRICT COURT OF KRASNOYARSK AS AN ATTACHED DOCUMENT TO THE APPLICATION THROUGH THE “CITIZENS APPEAL” SYSTEM

THE ORIGINAL OF THE APPLICATION IS SENT BY POST TO THE COURT ADDRESS.

To your appeal dated December 20, 2013, received by the Nazarovo City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory on December 23, 2013, entrance. No. 2-38/13 through the official website of the court on the Internet, to which is attached a copy of the appeal of N.A. Bachurin. on the decision of the Nazarovsky City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory dated November 7, 2013 in a civil case brought by N.V. Skvortsov, V.N. Skvortsov. to Mikhienko A.V. about the collection of the amount of debt, interest for the use of other people's funds, expenses for paying for the services of a representative, state duty, I inform you that the copy of this appeal does not contain the original signature of N.A. Bachurin. The appeal will be considered after it is received by the court with the original signature of N.A. Bachurin.

660049 Krasnoyarsk, Mira Ave., 17

third party: Zaitsev Dmitry Vasilievich 660049, Krasnoyarsk, Mira Ave., 57

plaintiff: Skvortsov Nikolay Vladimirovich 660125, Krasnoyarsk, st. Urvantseva, 34, apt. 149

defendant: Alexey Viktorovich Mikhienko mailing address: 660049, Krasnoyarsk, Mira Ave., 57

civil case No. 2-38/13

A P E L L Y T ​​I O N N A Y J A L O B A

The Nazarovo City Court made a decision to satisfy Skvortsov’s claims against Mikhienko for the recovery of funds.

The decision taken by the court is not justified, contradicts the norms of material and procedural law, will be canceled for the following reasons:

- the court did not involve third parties in the case, whose interests were directly affected by this court decision, as well as procedural actions court - to take measures to secure the claim. Despite the reliable information available in the case about the registration of ownership of the car since 2008 “Lexus RX - 300” for Diana Vladimirovna Zaitseva, who has not been married to Dmitry Vasilyevich Zaitsev since 2005, the car “Toyota RAV - 4” for Svetlana Mikhienko Viktorovna ( marriage contract between the Mikhienko spouses from 2005) the court did not involve them in the consideration of this case. He also grossly violated the rights of Nikolai Alekseevich Bachurin by not involving him as a third party in the case, although the court reliably knew (request from the Kirov RFU in Krasnoyarsk) about the existing legal (contractual) relations in relation to the Lexus car between him and Diana Zaitseva Vladimirovna and the claims brought against Zaitseva by Bachurin in the Kirov RFU of Krasnoyarsk. IN currently Diana Vladimirovna Zaitseva and Dmitry Vasilievich Zaitsev will have to bear additional costs for Bachurin’s new demands, for failure to fulfill the purchase and sale agreement for Lexus. financial liability through the fault of the Nazarovsky City Court.
- the court unreasonably refused to satisfy D.V. Zaitsev’s claim. petitions for a comprehensive forensic examination of how long ago the receipt was drawn up. What was the violation of his right to receive and provide evidence confirming his position and the lack of money of the transaction and its signing in the period July - August 2008, and not in November 2007
- the court violated the defendant’s right to familiarize himself with the expert’s conclusion, as well as to provide any explanations on its conclusions, as well as the unreasonable imposition on the defendant of the obligation to pay for its conduct in the amount of 12,000 rubles. Since before it was carried out, the defendant filed a petition to withdraw materials from expert institution and refusal to pay for the examination
- the court did not evaluate the indication in the receipt of the loan amount in the form of foreign currency, as indicated by the third party and the defendant. The court was repeatedly told that individuals, in accordance with the Law of the Russian Federation “On currency regulation in the Russian Federation" do not have the right to enter into transactions with each other in foreign currency on the territory of the Russian Federation
- the court did not assess the fact that Dmitry Vasilyevich Zaitsev acted as a mortgagor for the property owned by Pashayan, on the basis of a power of attorney issued by the plaintiff Vladimir Nikolaevich Skvortsov, property that the plaintiff Skvortsov could independently dispose of. This directly indicates the invalidity of the transaction and its falsity.
- the court did not assess the absence of any material claims on the part of the plaintiffs regarding the subject of the Lexus pledge, but despite this fact - the seizure of the car. As well as repeatedly stated by the third party and the defendant, the omission of the limitation period for foreclosure on the subject of collateral.

Based on the aforesaid and guided by Article. Art. 320-322, 328 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation,

1. Restore the deadline for appealing the decision of the Nazarovsky City Court of November 7, 2013, since in final form it was manufactured on November 14, 2013 and received by mail on November 20, 2013 - month period Appeal deadline is December 20, 2013
2. To cancel the decision of the Nazarovsky City Court on the claim of Nikolai Vladimirovich Skvortsov, Vladimir Nikolaevich Skvortsov against Alexey Viktorovich Mikhienko for the collection of the debt.

Third party_______________________________________________D.V. Zaitsev

The original of the appeal was sent by regular postal mail on December 19, 2013 with 3 copies according to the number of persons involved.

To your appeal dated December 19, 2013, containing the text of the appeal against the decision of the Nazarovo City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory dated November 7, 2013 in a civil case brought by N.V. Skvortsov, V.N. Skvortsov. to Mikhienko A.V. on the collection of the amount of debt, interest for the use of other people's funds, expenses for paying for the services of a representative, state duty, received by the Nazarovsky City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory on December 20, 2013. No. 2-38/13, I inform you that by the ruling of the Nazarovo City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory dated December 20, 2013, the appeal of Zaitsev D.V. the above decision of the Nazarovsky City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory was left without movement, Zaitsev D.V. appointed reasonable time to correct the shortcomings of the complaint, a copy of the ruling of the Nazarovo City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory dated December 20, 2013 on leaving the appeal of Zaitsev D.V. without movement, directed to D.V. Zaitsev.

nazarovo—krk.sudrf.ru

Taganrog City Court
Rostov region

Please note that the official email address of the Taganrog City Court has changed. In this regard, we ask you to send letters to new address
The previous email address is no longer in use and will be disabled as of December 1, 2016.

Opening hours of the Taganrog City Court of the Rostov Region

Monday – Thursday 09:00 – 18:00

Friday 09:00 – 16:45

lunch break 13:00 – 13:45

On pre-holiday days, the working day is shortened by 1 hour.

Reception of citizens and representatives of organizations applying on issues not related to the substance of specific criminal, civil and administrative cases considered by the court is carried out by the chairman of the Taganrog City Court of the Rostov Region and his deputies. In addition, reception of citizens regarding complaints of a non-procedural nature is carried out by authorized person- court staff member. Reception of citizens and representatives of organizations is carried out for the purpose of prompt consideration of their appeals falling within the competence of the court. Reception of citizens and representatives of organizations court cases not in court.

citizens and representatives of legal entities:

Chairman of the Taganrog City Court of the Rostov Region -

Kalinchenko Alexander Alexandrovich

every Monday from 16-00 to 18-00

Thursday from 09-00 to 10-00

(underway pre-entry in room 31)

Deputy Chairman of the Taganrog City Court of the Rostov Region -

Romanenko Sergey Vyacheslavovich

Wednesday from 16-00 - 17-00

Reception of claims, statements, appeals, appeals and issuance court documents carried out by the receptionist

Taganrog City Court in the building at the address: Taganrog, st. Chucheva, 42/2 office. No. 1,12 tel. 37-23-63

taganrogsky.ros.sudrf.ru

Hello, dear visitors!

The website of the Severobaikalsk City Court was created in order to ensure openness, accessibility and increase confidence in justice.

On this page you can ask questions related to the organization of the work of the Severobaikalsk City Court of the Republic of Buryatia and the justices of the peace of the Severobaikalsk region, leave your comments, reviews, remarks and suggestions. When preparing questions, please take into account that in accordance with the Recommendations of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Council of Europe dated May 14, 1981. No. R(81)7 and dated September 11, 1995 No. R(95)12 courts have no right to give legal advice and consultations on the merits of the case - so as not to violate the principle of equality of parties.

On home page Using the site's easy navigation, you can obtain information about the court.

The website has a module “Judicial Office Work”, where you can find detailed information about the progress of affairs.

Samples of counterclaims, complaints, applications, statements of claim are posted in the subsection “Samples of documents” of the section “ reference Information". Information on payment of the state duty and fine is posted in the “State Duty” subsection.

In connection with the modernization of the site, the previously existing “Judicial Acts” tab has been abolished; you can get acquainted with information about the progress of the case, as well as published depersonalized information about the progress of the case, as well as published depersonalized judicial acts using the “Judicial Proceedings” tab

The Severobaikalsk City Court of the Republic of Buryatia accepts online requests from citizens regarding the organization of the work of the court. We accept for consideration appeals related to violations of the right to access to justice, the right to decent treatment, or violation of deadlines for consideration of court cases. You can leave your message in the “Citizens' Appeals” section by filling out special form. Received messages will be considered by the chairman of the Severobaikalsk City Court of the Republic of Buryatia. Instructions for working with this section can be found in the “Instructions” subsection in the “Reference Information” section.

Sent messages are sent to the chairman of the court. The chairman may delegate the preparation of answers to a number of questions to his deputies, assistants or relevant departments of the court. Questions regarding the operation of the site go to the site administrator. Please note that a question is published on the site only after it has been reviewed by a moderator.

In accordance with clause 4.4 of the Instructions for judicial proceedings in the district court, approved by the Order Judicial Department at Supreme Court Russian Federation dated April 29, 2003 No. 36, applications containing offensive language are not subject to consideration.

severobaikalsky.bur.sudrf.ru

Nazarovo City Court

Sarmanovsky District Court
Republic of Tatarstan

Receiving applications and complaints from citizens, their representatives, as well as representatives of legal entities

carried out in paper and electronic versions.

Submission section procedural documents V in electronic format located in the upper left corner of the site
» Submission of procedural documents in electronic form «
Also read the submission rules: (download)

Attention! Lists of cases assigned for consideration and the results of consideration of cases in automatic mode(after update software dated November 21, 2012) are placed in the COURT PROCEEDINGS section and there you can view judicial acts issued in certain cases. Personal data of participants trial hidden because they cannot be displayed on the Internet.

In the REFERENCE INFORMATION section we offer you: details for paying state fees and fines, sample documents and other information that you may need to go to court.

The STATE FEES CALCULATION section will allow you to use the state duty calculator, which allows you not only to calculate the amount of the state duty to be paid, but also to print a receipt for subsequent payment at the bank.

Dear site visitors!

Admissions to email court and in the section “Citizens' Appeals” documents of a procedural nature (statements of claim, cassation appeals, supervisory complaints, petitions to postpone the court hearing and other statements of a procedural nature) are not accepted for consideration and are not taken into account when making decisions, since they do not contain the signatures of the persons who sent the document.

In the Sarmanovsky District Court of the Republic of Tatarstan, it has become possible to notify participants in proceedings about the place, date and time of the consideration of the case in court using SMS messages.

The fact of consent to receive SMS notification is confirmed by a receipt, which, along with data about the participant in the proceedings and his consent to notification in this way, indicates the number mobile phone, to which it is sent.

sarmanovsky.tat.sudrf.ru

Welcome to the official website of the Nazyvaevsky City Court!

Achievement high level publicity, openness and transparency of justice is the most important condition successful development of judicial reform.

In accordance with Art. 6 Federal Law dated December 22, 2008 No. 262-FZ “On ensuring access to information about the activities of courts in the Russian Federation” one of the ways to provide access to such information is to post it on the Internet.

The work of the site is aimed at providing open, accessible and timely information to its users about the activities of our court.

In the section of the website “About the Court” you can familiarize yourself with the following information: about the history of the creation of the Nazyvaevsky City Court, about the composition of the court, about the working hours of the court, about the work of the court reception, about the powers of the court (information about the jurisdiction of cases district court and justices of the peace), on territorial jurisdiction.

In the “Reference Information” section of the website, you can familiarize yourself with the procedure for filing claims, appealing judicial acts, familiarizing yourself with case materials, the procedure for considering citizens’ appeals, the procedure for paying and the amount of state duty, details for paying fines, and also download a receipt for paying state duty. The section also provides samples of the most frequently filed applications to the court.

Lists of cases scheduled for hearing can be found in the “Court Proceedings” section.

Instructions for finding information on court cases.

The texts of judicial acts to be posted in accordance with Federal Law No. 262-FZ of December 22, 2008 “On ensuring access to information about the activities of courts in the Russian Federation” are contained in the “Judicial Acts” section.

Information about justices of the peace in the city of Omsk and the Omsk region is contained in the section “Judges of the Peace”.

In the “Citizens' Appeals” section you can ask a question about the work of the court.

The site pages are regularly updated with reviews judicial practice, analytical materials, product reviews mass media, news about the work of the court.

We hope that the information posted on the official website of the Nazyvaevsky City Court will be useful to you!

Judicial acts and decisions - Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory)

Decision of September 28, 2018 in case No. 2-1236/2018

Claims of Endaltseva R.V. to CB Renaissance Credit (LLC) on the protection of consumer rights, partially satisfied. To recover from CB Renaissance Credit (LLC) in favor of Endaltseva R.V. interest on the use of other people's funds in the amount of<данные изъяты>, compensation moral damage at the rate of<данные изъяты>, a fine of<данные изъяты>. The rest of the claims will be rejected...

Decision of September 26, 2018 in case No. 2-1222/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

Claims of Tsvetsykh E.S. to the Municipal Budgetary Preschool Educational Institution "Preobrazhensky kindergarten“Baby” on the collection of underaccrued and unpaid wages to be satisfied. Collect from the Municipal Budget Preschool educational institution“Preobrazhensky kindergarten “Baby” in favor of E. S. Tsvetsykh...

Decision of September 25, 2018 in case No. 2-1155/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

Claims by Airikh S.F., Sochina D.V. to Frolova A.A. on the collection of monetary compensation for the use of part of the residential premises - satisfy. Collect from Frolova A.A. in favor of Eirich S.F. monetary compensation for the use of part of a residential premises with an area of ​​14.26 sq.m., located at<адрес>, in the amount of 2,423 (two thousand four hundred twenty-three) rubles monthly, starting from October 1, 2018. Collect from Frolova A.A. in favor of Sochina D.V...

Decision of September 24, 2018 in case No. 2-1209/2017

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

Oblige Government agency– Management Pension Fund of the Russian Federation in the city of Nazarovo and the Nazarovsky district of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, include M.V. Shipilova in her work experience, which gives the right to assign an early insurance pension on the basis of clause 20, part 1, article 30 of the Federal Law of December 28, 2013 No. 400-FZ “ About insurance pensions": in preferential terms: - from DD.MM.YYYY to DD.MM.YYYY - the period of internship, from DD.MM.YYYY to DD.MM.YYYY, from DD.MM.YYYY to DD.MM ...

Verdict of September 21, 2018 in case No. 1-228/2018

Matveykin M.N. committed an illegal alteration firearms, and illegal possession firearms. The crimes were committed under the following circumstances. In August 2017, exact date and the time was not established by the inquiry, Matveykin M.N. being in the fence of the house at the address<адрес>, in violation of Article 16 of the Federal Law of December 13...

Resolution of September 17, 2018 in case No. 5-324/2018

DD.MM.YYYY at 22 hours 30 minutes at<адрес>Yuriev A.A. in a state of intoxication, expressed himself with coarse obscene language in public place in the presence of citizen Talalai S.V. In response to the repeated demands of the police officer of the PPSP of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia "Nazarovsky" FULL NAME5 to stop hooliganism Yuryev A.A. did not react, defiantly violated public order, showing clear disrespect for society. These actions contain the composition administrative offense, provided for in Part 2 of Art. 20...

Decision of September 17, 2018 in case No. 2-1790/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

Statement of claim by Valery Gennadievich Golubev to the administration of the city of Nazarovo, Krasnoyarsk Territory, for recognition as having accepted the inheritance, recognition of ownership of inherited property to satisfy. Recognize Valery Gennadievich Golubev as having accepted the inheritance after the death of FULL NAME1, deceased DD.MM.YYYY, recognize the ownership right of Valery Gennadievich Golubev to the inherited property FULL NAME1 in the form real estate– apartment located at:<адрес>with a total area of ​​34.9 sq.m...

Decision of September 17, 2018 in case No. 2-1357/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

To recover from the Municipal Budget Preschool Educational Institution “Preobrazhensky Kindergarten “Malyshok”” in favor of Sarazhakova A.G. underaccrued wages in the amount of 18,631 rubles 96 kopecks. To collect from the Municipal Budgetary Preschool Educational Institution "Preobrazhensky Kindergarten "Malyshok" a state fee in the amount of 745 rubles 27 kopecks to the local budget...

Decision of September 14, 2018 in case No. 2A-1271/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

In satisfaction of the administrative claim of the Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service of Russia No. 12 for the Krasnoyarsk Territory against Batog S.N. on collection of arrears in the amount of 408.63 rubles: transport tax With individuals in the amount of 375.00 rubles, a penalty in the amount of 33.63 rubles - refuse. The decision can be appealed to appeal procedure to Krasnoyarsk regional court through the Nazarovsky City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory within a month from the date of the final court decision. Presiding Savvateeva M.A...

Decision of September 14, 2018 in case No. 2-1667/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

The claims of Donnikov Yuri Mikhailovich, Terentyev Nikolai Mikhailovich, Zubareva Nadezhda Leontievna against the regional state budgetary educational institution "Nazarovskaya School" for the recovery of underaccrued and unpaid wages are partially satisfied. To recover from the regional state budgetary educational institution "Nazarovskaya School" in favor of Donnikov Yuri Mikhailovich the underaccrued wages for the period from 07/01/2017 to 07/31...

Decision of September 14, 2018 in case No. 2-1654/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

Claims PJSC requirements Sberbank represented by Krasnoyarsk branch No. to Shitikova N.N. on debt collection loan agreement, to satisfy. Collect from Shitikova N.N. in favor of PJSC "Sberbank of Russia" debt under the loan agreement in the amount of 179,481 rubles 97 kopecks, including: loan debt - 130,740 rubles 63 kopecks, interest - 27,162 rubles 94 kopecks, penalty - 2,161 rubles 57 kopecks, expenses for payment of the state fee in the amount of 4,789 rubles 64 kopecks...

Resolution of September 12, 2018 in case No. 5-319/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Administrative offenses

Decision of September 12, 2018 in case No. 2-1454/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

Claims of PJSC Sovcombank against Pokhabova M.A. partially satisfy. Collect from Pokhabova M.A. in favor of PJSC Sovcombank, the debt under the loan agreement in the amount of 153,929 rubles 21 kopecks, the cost of paying the state duty in the amount of 5,677 rubles 67 kopecks. The decision can be appealed to<адрес>howl trial through Nazarovo City Court<адрес>within a month from the date of its adoption in final form. Chairman E.I. Katsevich The reasoned decision was drawn up DD.MM.YYYY...

Decision of September 11, 2018 in case No. 2-1436/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

Claims of PJSC CB Vostochny against D.D. Goncharov to satisfy the debt collection under the loan agreement. Collect from Goncharov D.D. in favor of PJSC CB "Vostochny" debt under the loan agreement in the amount of 108,228 rubles 84 kopecks, including: principal debt - 51,119 rubles 36 kopecks, interest on the loan - 57,109 rubles 48 kopecks, as well as the cost of paying state duty in the amount of 3,364 rubles 58 kopecks...

Verdict of September 11, 2018 in case No. 1-139/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Criminal

Rassudov G.A. committed theft from clothing that was on the victim, and also committed theft. The crimes were committed under the following circumstances. December 16, 2017 at about 3 p.m. 00 min. at Rassudov G.A., who is in<адрес>, there was a selfish intent aimed at secret theft other people's property. Implementing his plans, out of selfish motives, Rassudov G.A., being able alcohol intoxication, taking advantage of what is behind him criminal acts no one is watching, he approached the sleeping O...

Decision of September 11, 2018 in case No. 2-1099/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

Claims of Korobeynikova N.M. to the Municipal Budgetary Educational Institution "Secondary comprehensive school No. 11" of the city of Nazarovo, Krasnoyarsk Territory, regarding the recovery of wages, partially satisfied. To recover from the Municipal Budgetary Educational Institution “Secondary School No. 11” of the city of Nazarovo, Krasnoyarsk Territory, in favor of N.M. Korobeynikova...

Decision of September 11, 2018 in case No. 2-1791/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

The statement of claim of Mikhail Vladimirovich Kurash to the administration of the city of Nazarovo, Krasnoyarsk Territory, for the inclusion of property in the inheritance, recognition of property rights in the order of inheritance, is satisfied. Include in the inheritance after the death of the testator FULL NAME2, DD.MM.YYYY year of birth of the deceased DD.MM.YYYY, non-residential premises garage box located at:<адрес>, with a total area of ​​20.6 sq.m. Recognize Kurash as Mikhail Vladimirovich, DD.MM...

Decision of September 10, 2018 in case No. 2-1116/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

Claims of Petrova I.A. to Knysh T.I. on removing the boundaries of a land plot from cadastral registration with retention of property rights to satisfy. Remove the boundaries of a land plot from cadastral registration cadastral number No. at:<адрес>with reservation of rights municipal property municipality the city of Nazarovo, Krasnoyarsk Territory, to the specified land plot...

Decision of September 10, 2018 in case No. 2-1462/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

Claims of the Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal tax service No. by<адрес>to Galkov S.I. about collection unjust enrichment to satisfy. Collect from Galkov S.I. the amount of unjust enrichment received in connection with an unlawfully declared property deduction, in the amount of 76,221 (seventy-six thousand two hundred twenty-one) rubles. Collect from Galkov S.I. state duty in the amount of 2486 rubles 63 kopecks to the local budget...

Verdict of September 7, 2018 in case No. 1-221/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Criminal

Fadeev V.A. committed knowingly false denunciation about committing a crime under the following circumstances. 05/16/2018 at about 11:00 am Fadeev V.A...

Decision of September 6, 2018 in case No. 2-1140/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

Claims of EOS LLC against Vasilyeva N.V., Glazunova G.V. to satisfy the debt collection under the loan agreement. Collect jointly and severally with Vasilyeva N.V., Glazunova N.V. in favor of EOS LLC, the debt under the loan agreement dated DD.MM.YYYY in the amount of 124,104 rubles. Collect from Vasilyeva N.V. in favor of EOS LLC, the debt under the loan agreement dated DD.MM.YYYY in the amount of 567,713 rubles 06 kopecks. Collect jointly and severally with N.V. Vasilyeva, G.V. Glazunova...

Verdict of September 6, 2018 in case No. 1-96/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Criminal

Petrov V.S. and Endaltseva E.P., acting as part of a group of persons prior agreement, committed a theft involving causing significant damage citizen. The crime was committed under the following circumstances. 12/19/2017 at about 16:00 at Endaltseva E.P. and Petrova V.S., located in<адрес>edge, a sudden mercenary intent arose aimed at secretly stealing a car belonging to K.<данные изъяты>with the state registration plate «<данные изъяты>"worth 130,000 rubles...

Decision of September 5, 2018 in case No. 2-1193/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

Claims of JSC Nazarovskaya GRES against Romanenko Yu.V. on debt collection for heating and hot water supply - satisfy. Collect from Romanenko Yu.V. in favor of JSC "Nazarovskaya GRES" debt for heating and hot water supply in the amount of 53,243 (fifty-three thousand two hundred forty-three) rubles 62 kopecks, in reimbursement of expenses for paying the state duty of 1,797 (one thousand seven hundred ninety-seven) rubles 31 kopecks.. .

• ...The requirements of PJSC Sovcombank are partially satisfied. To collect from Anastasia Viktorovna Korshkova in favor of PJSC Sovcombank the debt under loan agreement No. dated February 23, 2012 in the amount of 199,581.56 rubles (one hundred ninety-nine thousand five hundred eighty-one rubles 56 kopecks), of which the principal amount is 117,260.94 rubles (one hundred seventeen thousand two hundred sixty rubles 94 kopecks), the amount of overdue interest is 67,320.62 rubles (sixty-seven thousand three hundred twenty rubles 62 kopecks...

  Decision of July 30, 2018 in case No. 2-1131/2018

  Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

  The claim of EOS LLC against Marina Vladimirovna Mamontova for the collection of the amount of debt under the loan agreement is satisfied. To collect from Marina Vladimirovna Mamontova in favor of EOS LLC the amount of debt under loan No. as of May 14, 2018 in the amount of 232,787.32 rubles, consisting of the principal amount in the amount of 191,406.27 rubles, interest for use in the amount of 41,381.05 ruble; to refund the amount of state duty 5527.88 rubles...

Decision of July 30, 2018 in case No. 2-1130/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

The claim of EOS LLC against Anton Gennadievich Kiselev for collection of the amount of debt under the loan agreement is satisfied. To collect from Anton Gennadievich Kiselev in favor of EOS LLC the amount of debt under loan No. as of May 14, 2018 in the amount of 264,039.60 rubles, consisting of the principal amount of 213,481.47 rubles, interest for use in the amount of 50,558.13 rubles , the amount of state duty is 5840.40 rubles...

Decision of July 30, 2018 in case No. 2-1167/2018

Nazarovo City Court (Krasnoyarsk Territory) - Civil and administrative

Valentina Mikhailovna Antonova's statement of claim to the administration of the city of Nazarovo, Krasnoyarsk Territory, for recognition as having accepted the inheritance, recognition of the right of ownership of the inherited property, to be satisfied. Recognize Antonova Valentina Mikhailovna as having accepted the inheritance after the death of FULL NAME5, deceased DD.MM.YYYY, recognize the right of ownership of Antonova Valentina Mikhailovna to the inherited property FULL NAME5 in the form? shares in the ownership of an apartment at:<адрес> «<адрес>with total area<данные изъяты>sq...

DEFINITION original

Nazarovo City Court of the Krasnoyarsk Territory composed of:

presiding judge Savvateeva M.A.,

under secretary Petrova I.A.

with the participation of plaintiff Tokoyakova T.S., acting in her own interests and the interests of minors T, DD.MM.YYYY year of birth, T, DD.MM.YYYY year of birth, Tokoyakova M.E., defendant Kharsekina A.A., third person not declaring independent requirements regarding the subject of the dispute Tokoyakova E.A.,

having considered in open court a civil case regarding statement of claim Tokoyakova T.S. , acting in its own interests and the interests of minors T, DD.MM.YYYY year of birth, T, DD.MM.YYYY year of birth to Kharsekina A.A. , Kharsekina A.G. on removing obstacles to use land plot not related to deprivation of possession, recognition illegal actions

the defendant, the obligation to eliminate the violations of law,

INSTALLED:

Tokoyakova T.S. went to court in her own interests and the interests of minors T, DD.MM.YYYY year of birth, Tokoyakova E.E., DD.MM.YYYY year of birth with a claim against Kharsekina A.A. on eliminating obstacles to the use of a land plot not related to deprivation of possession, declaring the actions of the defendant illegal, and the obligation to eliminate violations of the right.

According to the claims, she asked to oblige the defendant to remove the obstacle to the plaintiff’s use of the land plot, namely: to install a limiter to delay the gate opening from the defendant’s garage, to install a drainage drain on the roof of the garage on the side bordering the plaintiff’s land plot, to install a fence dividing the plaintiff’s land plots and defendant.

The court invited the minor T to participate in the case, and A.G. Kharsekin was brought in as a co-defendant.

At the court hearing, the plaintiff renounced her claims and asks that the proceedings in the case be terminated, due to the fact that drains and a gate holder were installed, she has no claims against the defendants.

Tokoyakov M.E. supported the application to terminate the proceedings.

Defendant Kharsekina A.A. has no objections to the termination of proceedings in the case. Defendant Kharsekin A.G., duly notified of the court hearing, in court hearing

didn't show up.

A third party who does not make independent claims regarding the subject of the dispute Tokoyakov E.A. has no objections to the termination of proceedings in the case.

Representatives of third parties who did not make independent claims regarding the subject of the dispute - the administration of the Stepnovsky village council of the Nazarovsky district of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, the administration of the Nazarovsky district of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, who were properly notified of the court hearing, did not appear at the court hearing, according to the statements sent to the court, they asked for the case to be considered in the absence of a representative .

Having heard the persons participating in the case, the court considers it possible to accept the plaintiff’s refusal of the stated claims.

By virtue of Article 39 Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation Federation, the plaintiff has the right to refuse the stated demands and the refusal can be accepted by the court if this does not contradict the law and does not violate the rights and interests of other persons.

According to Art. 220 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, the court terminates the proceedings if the plaintiff renounces the demands and the refusal is accepted by the court.

The plaintiff’s refusal of the claims does not contradict the law and does not violate anyone’s rights or interests protected by law, does not violate the rights of the defendants, the plaintiff renounces the claims voluntarily and understands the consequences of refusal. The court has no reason not to accept the waiver of claims.

Based on the above, guided by Art. Art. 39, 220, 221, 224-225 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation,

DEFINED:

Accept the refusal of the plaintiff Tokoyakova T.S. , acting in its own interests and the interests of minors T, DD.MM.YYYY year of birth, T, DD.MM.YYYY year of birth from claims against Kharsekina A.A. , Kharsekina A.G.

on eliminating obstacles to the use of a land plot not related to deprivation of possession, declaring the actions of the defendant illegal, and the obligation to eliminate violations of the right.

Proceedings in a civil case based on the claim of Tokoyakova T.S. , acting in its own interests and the interests of minors T, DD.MM.YYYY year of birth, T, DD.MM.YYYY year of birth to Kharsekina A.A. , Kharsekina A.G. on the elimination of obstacles to the use of a land plot not related to deprivation of possession, recognition of the defendant’s actions as illegal, the obligation to eliminate the violations of the right, to terminate, in connection with the plaintiff’s refusal of the claims. Explain to the plaintiff Tokoyakova T.S. , What

repeated appeal the same defendants are not allowed to go to court on the same subject and on the same grounds Can be brought for determination

private complaint