Colin campbell chinese study read - colin campbell. The China Study (Colin Campbell): Reviews and Critics of the China Study read online in full


Current page: 1 (total of the book has 36 pages) [available passage for reading: 7 pages]

Colin Campbell, Thomas Campbell
Chinese study. Findings of the largest study of the relationship between nutrition and health

Published with permission from BenBella Books c / o PERSEUS BOOKS, Inc. and the agency of Alexander Korzhenevsky.

Published in Russian for the first time

© T. Colin Campbell, Ph.D. and Thomas M. Campbell II, 2004

© Translation into Russian, edition in Russian, design. LLC "Mann, Ivanov and Ferber", 2013

All rights reserved. No part of the electronic version of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including posting on the Internet and corporate networks, for private and public use without the written permission of the copyright holder.

Legal support of the publishing house is provided by the law firm "Vegas-Lex"

© The electronic version of the book was prepared by Litres (www.litres.ru)

This book is well complemented by:

Longevity rules

Dan Buettner

Healthy to death

A.J. Jacobs

The age of happiness

Vladimir Yakovlev

Healthy habits

Lydia Ionova

Partner Foreword

Dear readers, if you are holding this book in your hands, then get ready for amazing discoveries!

This book will break many stereotypes about proper nutrition and a healthy lifestyle in general. She will tell you how food can cause and influence many chronic diseases, which foods should be consumed in order to be healthy and which should not.

The book "Chinese Research" will become a real discovery for you, and it has become for us, the largest supplier of nuts and dried fruits to Russia, the GUD-FOOD Group of Companies.

After examining its content, we were amazed at the results of a study conducted by Dr. Colin Campbell, professor, one of the world's leading experts in the field of food biochemistry. Nutritional stereotypes are so ingrained in our traditions that the contents of the book initially aroused surprise and indignation. The author of the book provided the reader with all the necessary data on which we can conclude: many of the products, the benefits of which we have been told from childhood, not only do not bring a positive result for human health, but also destroy it over time, causing such well-known diseases as ischemic disease heart, diabetes, cancer of various organs, etc. It is noteworthy that among the important foods in the diet, the author singles out nuts. In his opinion, their rational use undoubtedly benefits the body. As a professional in its field, "GOOD-FOOD" has a deep knowledge of the benefits and unique properties of this product. For 16 years the company has been supplying large stores and food enterprises in Russia with nuts and dried fruits. The impressive experience and the presence of its own laboratory give the company the opportunity to study these products in detail. Undoubtedly, nuts, as well as dried fruits, are natural sources of good health and an important component of proper nutrition. The data presented in the book fully confirms this fact.

As a partner of the book "China Study", we want to express our caring position on the health problems of modern society. According to statistics, in 2013, more than a third of the population of Russia is obese, about 3 million patients with diabetes are registered, 2.5 million people are registered with malignant tumors, and the share of total mortality in Russia from cardiovascular diseases is 57%. The statistics are terrifying, but each of us has a chance to avoid these problems and live a long and happy life. This book will help you to take a fresh look at many diseases that are directly related to nutrition and which can be avoided with the right approach to the daily diet.

We wish you success on the path to good health and longevity, and we will be glad if our products will help you to walk this path with pleasure and pleasure!

Igor Petrovich Baranov,

President of the GUD-FOOD Group of Companies

Preface to the Russian edition

I have been engaged in dietology for over 15 years, and it seemed to me that there was nothing in this area that could surprise me - after all, I am aware of all the new information, I train doctors at my clinic using British and American guidelines. Together with my colleagues, I was the first from Russia to study at the School for the Treatment of Obesity in Cambridge. Every year at international scientific congresses, I learn about all new trends and significant research results. Yes, I thought that some new nuances might appear, but so that my ideas about "what is good and what is bad" in dietetics completely turned upside down - I could not even imagine this! But this is exactly what happened when I, as a scientific editor, participated in the work on Dr. Campbell's book "China Study", for the first time translated into Russian.

For me, the author has absolutely achieved his goal of “changing the way society thinks about nutritional information - removing ambiguities and making health simple and straightforward, while basing his claims on evidence from peer-reviewed nutritional research published in peer-reviewed experts in professional publications ”.

This is a revolutionary book that will not leave anyone indifferent: you will either become an ardent follower or an implacable opponent of Colin Campbell. Protein dieters are in for a bit of a disappointment, and I can already see bodybuilders ruthlessly criticizing "this American upstart." It's hard to imagine what will happen at the Institute of Nutrition, which issues its verdicts on the benefits of fast food! Most likely, the Russian scientific community will pretend that nothing happened and who this Campbell is, they do not know! Well, suppression and rigging of research results to please food manufacturers is not only Russian, but also, as Dr. Campbell writes, American reality. He points out that “the industry is not just monitoring 'dangerous' science projects. She actively promotes her version, regardless of the potential negative consequences for human health, doing this to the detriment of scientific objectivity. Particularly alarming is the fact that representatives of academic science are doing this, while hiding their true intentions. "

I would especially recommend this book to my fellow physicians. Since for Russia, as well as for America, “such a situation is relevant when doctors who do not have sufficient training in the field of nutrition prescribe milk and nutritional cocktails based on sugar to overweight diabetics; a diet high in meat and fat for patients seeking weight loss; and supplemental milk for patients with osteoporosis. The health damage caused by doctors' ignorance about nutrition is mind-boggling. " Perhaps this book will help make the “personal graveyard” of each doctor a little smaller.

If a miracle happens and the people who make decisions about the nutrition of our nation do not remain indifferent and criminally careless (or criminally cynical), then our children and grandchildren may have a chance not to lose their health in kindergarten and school canteens!

And every adult, after reading this book, will be able to make their own informed choice based on reliable information. I have already made mine and for the first time in my life observed Great Lent this year, because the restrictions on food set by him absolutely coincide with the recommendations of Colin Campbell!

And I am very proud that I personally know Professor Philip James, who did not allow the implementation of the intention to "bring the World Health Organization to its knees if it does not abandon its recommendations" to please the industry lobby. Will this happen in our country? Wait and see!

Lydia Ionova,

dietitian, founder of the "Clinic of Dr. Ionova",

Dedicated to Karen Campbell - her incredible love made this book appear

And to Thomas McIlvane Campbell and Betty Demott Campbell for their amazing gifts

Foreword

If your life is similar to the life of most modern Westerners, then you are surrounded by chain fast food outlets. You are bombarded with fast food ads. You see other advertisements for weight loss, which say you can eat anything, not exercise, and still lose those extra pounds. In today's world, it's easier to find a Snickers bar, Big Mac or Coca-Cola than an apple. And your kids eat in the school cafeteria, where the vegetable experience is limited to ketchup on a hamburger.

This is what Yale University nutrition scientists and activists call the toxic food environment. Most of us live in this environment today.

The unforgiving truth is that some people make huge amounts of money selling junk food. They want you to continue to eat the food they sell, even though it makes you fat, your vitality dries up, and your life expectancy and quality of life decrease. They want you to be submissive, suggestible, and ignorant. They don't want you to be informed, active, and energized, and they are willing to spend billions of dollars every year to achieve their goals.

You can come to terms with this and put yourself at the mercy of the junk food producers, or you can develop a healthier and more life-affirming relationship with your body and the food you eat. If you want to be full of health, fit, have a clear mind and a cheerful spirit, then you need an ally.

Fortunately, you just have such an ally in your hands. Colin Campbell, Ph.D., is widely recognized as a brilliant scientist, passionate researcher, and great humanist. Having the pleasure and honor of being his friend, I can state this and add something else: he is also a man of great humility and depth.

Professor Campbell's book "China Study" is a veritable ray of light in the modern dark realm, illuminating nutrition and health issues so clearly and completely that you will never again become a victim of those who profit from your ignorance, misunderstanding and submissive eating of what they sell. products.

In my opinion, one of the many benefits of this book is that Campbell is not just presenting his findings to you. He does not preach from above, pointing out to you, like a child, what is and what is not. Instead, like a trusted friend who has managed to learn, discover and accomplish more in life than many of us can even imagine, he unobtrusively, clearly and professionally brings you the information you need to fully understand issues related to diet and health. It gives you the freedom to make informed choices. Of course, he gives advice and advice, and they are excellent. But he always shows how he came to certain conclusions. Information and truth is what matters. Its sole purpose is to help you live your life as informed and healthy as possible.

I have already read the China Study twice and each time I discovered a lot. This is a bold and wise book. It's incredibly helpful, superbly written, and essential. Campbell's work is groundbreaking yet striking in its clear and concise manner of presentation.

If you want to eat eggs and bacon for breakfast and then take your blood cholesterol-lowering medication, it's up to you. However, if you intend to truly take care of your health, read the China Study and start doing it! If you heed the advice of this outstanding consultant, your body will thank you every day for the rest of your life.

John Robbins, author of Diet for a New America, Reclaiming Our Health and The Food Revolution 1
John Robbins is one of the world's leading experts on the impact of diet on human health. His books Diet for a New America, Reclaiming Our Health, and The Food Revolution became bestsellers. Approx. ed.

Introduction

The public's need for information about healthy eating has always amazed me, even after I dedicated my life to experimental research in this area. Diet books have become long-term bestsellers. Almost every popular magazine has recommendations, newspapers regularly publish articles on the topic, and healthy eating is constantly discussed on television and radio.

Given this wealth of information, are you sure you know how to improve your health?

Should you buy food labeled "organic" to avoid exposing your body to pesticides? Are environmental changes the main cause of cancer? Or is your health condition "predetermined" by the genes you received at birth? Do you really get fat from carbohydrates? Should you be concerned about the total fat you eat, or just saturated fat, or trans fat? What vitamins should you take, and should you do it at all? Are you buying extra fiber-fortified foods? Should you eat fish, and if so, how often? Do soy foods help prevent heart disease?

It seems to me that you are not quite sure about the answers to these questions. And you are not alone. Despite the large amount of information and different opinions, very few people really know what to do to improve their health.

And the reason is not that no relevant research has been carried out. They were carried out. We know a lot about the relationship between nutrition and health. However, real science is buried under a mass of unnecessary and even harmful information: it is pseudoscientific research paid for by food companies, newfangled diets and propaganda carried out by the food industry.

I want to change that. I want to give you a new framework for understanding nutrition and health that will help you clear your doubts, prevent and treat disease, and lead you to a fuller life.

I have been in the system for almost 50 years, held very high positions, developed and led large research projects, decided which ones would be funded, and used a lot of research materials to prepare reports for national expert councils.

Many common beliefs about food, health, and disease are wrong:

Synthetic chemicals in the environment and food, no matter how harmful they are, are not the main cause of cancer.

The genes that you inherit from your parents are not the main factor in determining whether or not you fall prey to one of the top ten causes of death.

With the hope that genetic research will ultimately lead to cures for various diseases, the more effective solutions that exist today are being ignored.

Careful monitoring of your intake of any nutrient, such as carbohydrates, fats, cholesterol, or omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, will not lead to better long-term health.

Vitamins and supplements will not give you long-term protection against disease.

Medication and surgery do not cure diseases that kill most people.

Your doctor probably doesn’t know what to do to achieve the best possible health condition for you.

I offer you nothing more and nothing less than a revision of your ideas about good nutrition. The provocative results of my forty years of biomedical research, including the findings of a 27-year laboratory program (funded by the most reputable foundations), show that eating well can save your life.

I will not ask you to believe in conclusions based on my own observations, as some popular authors do. There are 750 references in this book. 2
The bibliography is available on the website www.mann-ivanov-ferber.ru/books/healthy_eating/the-china-study. Approx. ed.

And the vast majority of them are primary sources of information, including hundreds of scientific publications by other researchers that point to ways to reduce the risk of cancer, heart disease, stroke, obesity, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, osteoporosis, Alzheimer's disease, kidney stones, and vision loss.

Dietary changes can help diabetic patients stop taking medications;

For the treatment of cardiovascular disease, dietary changes are sufficient;

The occurrence of breast cancer is associated with the level of female hormones in the blood, which is determined by the food consumed;

Eating dairy products can increase your risk of prostate cancer;

The antioxidants found in fruits and vegetables improve mental performance in old age;

A healthy diet can prevent the formation of kidney stones;

There is strong evidence for a link between infant nutrition and type 1 diabetes, one of the most dangerous childhood illnesses.

These findings suggest that proper nutrition is the most powerful weapon against disease we have. And understanding this scientific evidence is important not only for improving health - it also has important implications for our society as a whole. We are obliged to know why misinformation prevails in our society and why we are deeply mistaken in matters of nutrition and disease, how we improve health and how we treat disease.

More than 40 years ago, at the beginning of my career, I would never have thought that food and health problems are so closely related. Over the years, I have never given much thought to which food is more correct. I just ate what everyone else was eating: what I thought was good food. We all eat what is tasty, or what is convenient, or what our parents taught us to eat. Most of us live in a specific cultural environment that determines our culinary habits and tastes.

All this applied to me. I grew up on a dairy farm where milk was the main product that determined our existence. We were taught in school that cow's milk helps to strengthen bones and teeth. This is the most perfect product created by nature. On our farm, most of the food was grown in the vegetable garden or grazed in the pasture.

I was the first in my family to go to college. I first studied Veterinary Medicine at Pennsylvania State University and then attended Georgia State University Veterinary School for a year before Cornell recruited me with a scholarship to work on my graduate study in Animal Nutrition. I moved there in part because they were going to pay me to study, not the other way around. I got my master's degree there. I was the last graduate of Professor Clive McKay of Cornell University, who was known for extending the lifespan of rats by feeding them much less food than they would like. My research, for which I received my Ph.D. from the same university, was about finding ways to accelerate the growth of cows and sheep. I was trying to improve our production of animal protein, a key element of what I was told is "good nutrition."

I was going to improve people's health by recommending more meat, milk and eggs for their food. This was an obvious consequence of my own life on the farm. All the time that my views were forming, I was faced with the same topic: apparently, we eat healthy foods, especially those rich in high-quality animal protein.

I spent most of my early years working with two of the most toxic chemicals ever discovered - dioxin and aflatoxin. At MIT, I first worked on the chicken feed problem. Millions of chickens per year died from an unknown toxic chemical that was part of their feed, and my task was to identify and determine the structure of this substance. Two and a half years later, I helped discover dioxin, probably the most toxic chemical known. It generated enormous interest, especially as it became part of the 2,4,5-T herbicide, or the so-called "Agent Orange", which was later used to kill leaves in Vietnamese forests during the war.

After leaving MIT to take up a position at Virginia Tech, I began coordinating technical assistance for a national project in the Philippines to work with malnourished children. Part of the problem was research into the significant prevalence of liver cancer in Filipino children, usually an adult disease. The disease was thought to be caused by high consumption of aflatoxin, which is found in mold rot found on peanuts and grain crops. Aflatoxin is one of the most potent carcinogens known.

For 10 years, we have worked to improve the nutrition of the poor for children. The project was funded by the United States Agency for International Development. As a result, we have established about 110 self-help nutrition education centers throughout the country.

The goal of these efforts in the Philippines is simple - to create the conditions for children to consume as much protein as possible. It was widely believed that the poor nutrition of children around the world is mainly due to a lack of protein, especially from animal foods. Numerous universities and governments have tried to reduce what they believe to be a protein deficit in developing countries.

However, in the course of this project, I uncovered a dark secret. Children whose diet was high in protein were more likely to develop liver cancer! These were children from the wealthiest families.

Then I came across a research report from India that contained very important and provocative findings. Indian scientists studied two groups of rats. To one group, they gave the cancer-causing aflatoxin, and the diet of these experimental animals contained 20% protein, which is comparable to the usual consumption in Western countries. To another group, they gave the same amount of aflatoxin, while the protein content in the rat's diet was only 5%. Incredibly, absolutely all animals whose food consisted of 20% protein developed liver cancer, while none of the animals that consumed 5% protein fell victim to this disease. It was one hundred percent, undeniable evidence that nutrition neutralizes the effects of carcinogens, even very potent ones, and helps reduce the risk of cancer.

This information contradicted everything I had been taught before. It was heresy to claim that proteins are not healthy foods, let alone increase your risk of cancer. This was a turning point in my career. It would not be wise to study such a provocative issue at such an early stage in my scientific career. By challenging the benefits of protein and animal food in general, I risked being labeled a heretic, even if I had compelling scientific evidence.

However, I have never tried to blindly follow generally accepted rules. As I was learning to graze horses or livestock, hunt animals, fish, or work in the field, I realized that independent thinking is an important component of success. It could not be otherwise. Faced with difficulties in the field, I had to figure out what to do next. This is a real school, ask any country boy. The feeling of independence has remained with me to this day.

So, faced with difficult choices, I decided to launch a laboratory program to thoroughly investigate the role of nutrition, primarily protein, in cancer. My colleagues and I were careful in formulating hypotheses, strict in adhering to methodology, and conservative in our conclusions. I decided to start with a scientific background and study the biochemical characteristics of cancer formation. It was very important to understand not only that do they cause proteins cancer, but also how it happens. The decision was correct. By rigorously following scientific rules, I was able to explore this provocative topic without resorting to the predictable automatic responses that are usually offered when putting forward revolutionary ideas. This study was largely funded over the course of 27 years the most respectable organizations (most notably the US National Institutes of Health, the American Cancer Society, and the American Institute for Cancer Research). Then our results were rechecked (again) for publication in many of the best scientific journals.

Our findings were shocking. A low-protein diet prevented the development of cancer caused by aflatoxin, regardless of how much of this carcinogen was consumed by animals. If cancer had already arisen, then a low-protein diet severely inhibited its further development. In other words, the cancer-causing ability of this carcinogenic chemical was virtually nil thanks to a low-protein diet. Protein was so powerful in our diet that we could stimulate and stop cancer by simply changing our intake.

Moreover, the amount of protein consumed by animals was equal to that usually found in human diets. We did not use more of them, as is very often done in the study of carcinogens.

In addition, we found that not all proteins have this effect. What protein has played a consistent and decisive role in provoking cancer? Casein, of which 87% is a protein contained in cow's milk, provoked and accelerated the development of tumors at all stages of the disease. What types of proteins did not cause cancer, even when consumed in large quantities? Safe proteins were found in plant foods, including wheat and soy. As this picture emerged, I began to question my most persistent beliefs, which then finally collapsed.

The animal experiments did not end there. I have spearheaded the most comprehensive study on human nutrition, lifestyle and disease ever conducted. It was an ambitious project co-organized with Cornell University, Oxford University and the China Institute for Preventive Medicine. The New York Times called it the "Grand Prix of Epidemiology." The project examined a large number of diseases, as well as factors affecting nutrition and lifestyle in rural areas of China and, later, Taiwan. This project, better known as the China Study, has resulted in more 8000 statistically significant evidence of the relationship between different dietary habits and disease!

This project was particularly noteworthy because so many of the relationships found between nutrition and disease led to the same conclusion: those who ate mostly animal food were more prone to chronic disease. Even relatively small amounts of animal food produced negative effects. In contrast, those who ate predominantly plant-based foods were healthier and generally avoided chronic disease. These results could not be ignored. All studies, from animal testing of the effects of animal proteins to large-scale studies of human nutrition, have led to the same conclusions. The health effects of eating animal and plant foods were very different.

I could not and did not dwell on the results of our animal studies and large-scale studies of the nutrition of the Chinese, as impressive as these data may be. I turned to the findings of other scientists and clinicians. Their findings turned out to be some of the most interesting in the last 50 years.

These results, presented in Part II of the book, suggest that cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity can be cured with a healthy diet. Other studies provide compelling evidence that nutrition affects the occurrence of various types of cancer, autoimmune diseases, diseases of the bones, kidneys, vision, brain disorders in old age (such as cognitive dysfunction and Alzheimer's disease). More importantly, a diet that has repeatedly shown the ability to heal and prevent these diseases includes the same natural plant foods that I have previously discovered through laboratory and nutritional studies in Chinese people to help you achieve optimal health. The results of these studies are consistent with each other..

Yet despite the compelling nature of this information, the hope it provides, and the urgent need to understand nutrition and health issues, people are still confused... I have friends with heart disease who do not work and are depressed due to the fact that they are at the mercy of a disease that is considered incurable. I have spoken to women who are so afraid of breast cancer that they would like to surgically remove their own breasts and even their daughters' breasts, believing that this is the only way to minimize the risk of getting sick. Many of my acquaintances were discouraged, following the path of illness, despondency and confusion caused by concerns about health and possible measures to protect it.

Many people are confused and I will explain why. The reason discussed in Part IV of the book has to do with how health information is created and disseminated and who controls it. Since I have had the opportunity to observe from the inside how information about health is created for a long time, I have seen what is really happening and am ready to tell the world what is wrong with the system. The lines between government, industry, science and medicine have become blurred. The problem with the system is not corruption, which is usually portrayed in Hollywood style. The problems are much more subtle and at the same time much more dangerous.

The book is dedicated to this story, which began with my personal experience and culminated in the formation of new views on nutrition and health. Several years ago at Cornell University, I organized and taught a new elective course called Vegetarian Nutrition. This was the first time such a course was introduced at an American university, and it gained much more popularity than I could have imagined. This course focuses on the health benefits of a plant-based diet. After spending some time at MIT and Virginia Tech and then returning to Cornell University 30 years ago, I was tasked with integrating the concepts and principles of chemistry, biochemistry, physiology, and toxicology in a high-level course on nutrition.


Colin Campbell, Thomas Campbell

Chinese study. Findings of the largest study of the relationship between nutrition and health

Published with permission from BenBella Books c / o PERSEUS BOOKS, Inc. and the agency of Alexander Korzhenevsky.

Published in Russian for the first time

© T. Colin Campbell, Ph.D. and Thomas M. Campbell II, 2004

© Translation into Russian, edition in Russian, design. LLC "Mann, Ivanov and Ferber", 2013

All rights reserved. No part of the electronic version of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including posting on the Internet and corporate networks, for private and public use without the written permission of the copyright holder.

Legal support of the publishing house is provided by the law firm "Vegas-Lex"

© The electronic version of the book was prepared by Litres (www.litres.ru)

This book is well complemented by:

Longevity rules

Dan Buettner

Healthy to death

A.J. Jacobs

The age of happiness

Vladimir Yakovlev

Healthy habits

Lydia Ionova

Partner Foreword

Dear readers, if you are holding this book in your hands, then get ready for amazing discoveries!

This book will break many stereotypes about proper nutrition and a healthy lifestyle in general. She will tell you how food can cause and influence many chronic diseases, which foods should be consumed in order to be healthy and which should not.

The book "Chinese Research" will become a real discovery for you, and it has become for us, the largest supplier of nuts and dried fruits to Russia, the GUD-FOOD Group of Companies.

After examining its content, we were amazed at the results of a study conducted by Dr. Colin Campbell, professor, one of the world's leading experts in the field of food biochemistry. Nutritional stereotypes are so ingrained in our traditions that the contents of the book initially aroused surprise and indignation. The author of the book provided the reader with all the necessary data on which we can conclude: many of the products, the benefits of which we have been told from childhood, not only do not bring a positive result for human health, but also destroy it over time, causing such well-known diseases as ischemic disease heart, diabetes, cancer of various organs, etc. It is noteworthy that among the important foods in the diet, the author singles out nuts. In his opinion, their rational use undoubtedly benefits the body. As a professional in its field, "GOOD-FOOD" has a deep knowledge of the benefits and unique properties of this product. For 16 years the company has been supplying large stores and food enterprises in Russia with nuts and dried fruits. The impressive experience and the presence of its own laboratory give the company the opportunity to study these products in detail. Undoubtedly, nuts, as well as dried fruits, are natural sources of good health and an important component of proper nutrition. The data presented in the book fully confirms this fact.

As a partner of the book "China Study", we want to express our caring position on the health problems of modern society. According to statistics, in 2013, more than a third of the population of Russia is obese, about 3 million patients with diabetes are registered, 2.5 million people are registered with malignant tumors, and the share of total mortality in Russia from cardiovascular diseases is 57%. The statistics are terrifying, but each of us has a chance to avoid these problems and live a long and happy life. This book will help you to take a fresh look at many diseases that are directly related to nutrition and which can be avoided with the right approach to the daily diet.

We wish you success on the path to good health and longevity, and we will be glad if our products will help you to walk this path with pleasure and pleasure!

Igor Petrovich Baranov,

President of the GUD-FOOD Group of Companies

Preface to the Russian edition

I have been engaged in dietology for over 15 years, and it seemed to me that there was nothing in this area that could surprise me - after all, I am aware of all the new information, I train doctors at my clinic using British and American guidelines. Together with my colleagues, I was the first from Russia to study at the School for the Treatment of Obesity in Cambridge. Every year at international scientific congresses, I learn about all new trends and significant research results. Yes, I thought that some new nuances might appear, but so that my ideas about "what is good and what is bad" in dietetics completely turned upside down - I could not even imagine this! But this is exactly what happened when I, as a scientific editor, participated in the work on Dr. Campbell's book "China Study", for the first time translated into Russian.

For me, the author has absolutely achieved his goal of “changing the way society thinks about nutritional information - removing ambiguities and making health simple and straightforward, while basing his claims on evidence from peer-reviewed nutritional research published in peer-reviewed experts in professional publications ”.

This is a revolutionary book that will not leave anyone indifferent: you will either become an ardent follower or an implacable opponent of Colin Campbell. Protein dieters are in for a bit of a disappointment, and I can already see bodybuilders ruthlessly criticizing "this American upstart." It's hard to imagine what will happen at the Institute of Nutrition, which issues its verdicts on the benefits of fast food! Most likely, the Russian scientific community will pretend that nothing happened and who this Campbell is, they do not know! Well, suppression and rigging of research results to please food manufacturers is not only Russian, but also, as Dr. Campbell writes, American reality. He points out that “the industry is not just monitoring 'dangerous' science projects. She actively promotes her version, regardless of the potential negative consequences for human health, doing this to the detriment of scientific objectivity. Particularly alarming is the fact that representatives of academic science are doing this, while hiding their true intentions. "

I would especially recommend this book to my fellow physicians. Since for Russia, as well as for America, “such a situation is relevant when doctors who do not have sufficient training in the field of nutrition prescribe milk and nutritional cocktails based on sugar to overweight diabetics; a diet high in meat and fat for patients seeking weight loss; and supplemental milk for patients with osteoporosis. The health damage caused by doctors' ignorance about nutrition is mind-boggling. " Perhaps this book will help make the “personal graveyard” of each doctor a little smaller.

If a miracle happens and the people who make decisions about the nutrition of our nation do not remain indifferent and criminally careless (or criminally cynical), then our children and grandchildren may have a chance not to lose their health in kindergarten and school canteens!

And every adult, after reading this book, will be able to make their own informed choice based on reliable information. I have already made mine and for the first time in my life observed Great Lent this year, because the restrictions on food set by him absolutely coincide with the recommendations of Colin Campbell!

And I am very proud that I personally know Professor Philip James, who did not allow the implementation of the intention to "bring the World Health Organization to its knees if it does not abandon its recommendations" to please the industry lobby. Will this happen in our country? Wait and see!

Lydia Ionova,

dietitian, founder of the "Clinic of Dr. Ionova",

Published with permission from BenBella Books c / o PERSEUS BOOKS, Inc. and the agency of Alexander Korzhenevsky.

Published in Russian for the first time

© T. Colin Campbell, Ph.D. and Thomas M. Campbell II, 2004

© Translation into Russian, edition in Russian, design. LLC "Mann, Ivanov and Ferber", 2013

All rights reserved. No part of the electronic version of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, including posting on the Internet and corporate networks, for private and public use without the written permission of the copyright holder.

Legal support of the publishing house is provided by the law firm "Vegas-Lex"

This book is well complemented by:

Longevity rules

Dan Buettner

Healthy to death

A.J. Jacobs

The age of happiness

Vladimir Yakovlev

Healthy habits

Lydia Ionova

Partner Foreword

Dear readers, if you are holding this book in your hands, then get ready for amazing discoveries!

This book will break many stereotypes about proper nutrition and a healthy lifestyle in general. She will tell you how food can cause and influence many chronic diseases, which foods should be consumed in order to be healthy and which should not.

The book "Chinese Research" will become a real discovery for you, and it has become for us, the largest supplier of nuts and dried fruits to Russia, the GUD-FOOD Group of Companies.

After examining its content, we were amazed at the results of a study conducted by Dr. Colin Campbell, professor, one of the world's leading experts in the field of food biochemistry. Nutritional stereotypes are so ingrained in our traditions that the contents of the book initially aroused surprise and indignation. The author of the book provided the reader with all the necessary data on which we can conclude: many of the products, the benefits of which we have been told from childhood, not only do not bring a positive result for human health, but also destroy it over time, causing such well-known diseases as ischemic disease heart, diabetes, cancer of various organs, etc. It is noteworthy that among the important foods in the diet, the author singles out nuts. In his opinion, their rational use undoubtedly benefits the body. As a professional in its field, "GOOD-FOOD" has a deep knowledge of the benefits and unique properties of this product. For 16 years the company has been supplying large stores and food enterprises in Russia with nuts and dried fruits. The impressive experience and the presence of its own laboratory give the company the opportunity to study these products in detail. Undoubtedly, nuts, as well as dried fruits, are natural sources of good health and an important component of proper nutrition. The data presented in the book fully confirms this fact.

As a partner of the book "China Study", we want to express our caring position on the health problems of modern society. According to statistics, in 2013, more than a third of the population of Russia is obese, about 3 million patients with diabetes are registered, 2.5 million people are registered with malignant tumors, and the share of total mortality in Russia from cardiovascular diseases is 57%. The statistics are terrifying, but each of us has a chance to avoid these problems and live a long and happy life. This book will help you to take a fresh look at many diseases that are directly related to nutrition and which can be avoided with the right approach to the daily diet.

We wish you success on the path to good health and longevity, and we will be glad if our products will help you to walk this path with pleasure and pleasure!

Igor Petrovich Baranov,
President of the GUD-FOOD Group of Companies

Preface to the Russian edition

I have been engaged in dietology for over 15 years, and it seemed to me that there was nothing in this area that could surprise me - after all, I am aware of all the new information, I train doctors at my clinic using British and American guidelines. Together with my colleagues, I was the first from Russia to study at the School for the Treatment of Obesity in Cambridge. Every year at international scientific congresses, I learn about all new trends and significant research results. Yes, I thought that some new nuances might appear, but so that my ideas about "what is good and what is bad" in dietetics completely turned upside down - I could not even imagine this! But this is exactly what happened when I, as a scientific editor, participated in the work on Dr. Campbell's book "China Study", for the first time translated into Russian.

For me, the author has absolutely achieved his goal of “changing the way society thinks about nutritional information - removing ambiguities and making health simple and straightforward, while basing his claims on evidence from peer-reviewed nutritional research published in peer-reviewed experts in professional publications ”.

This is a revolutionary book that will not leave anyone indifferent: you will either become an ardent follower or an implacable opponent of Colin Campbell. Protein dieters are in for a bit of a disappointment, and I can already see bodybuilders ruthlessly criticizing "this American upstart." It's hard to imagine what will happen at the Institute of Nutrition, which issues its verdicts on the benefits of fast food! Most likely, the Russian scientific community will pretend that nothing happened and who this Campbell is, they do not know! Well, suppression and rigging of research results to please food manufacturers is not only Russian, but also, as Dr. Campbell writes, American reality. He points out that “the industry is not just monitoring 'dangerous' science projects. She actively promotes her version, regardless of the potential negative consequences for human health, doing this to the detriment of scientific objectivity. Particularly alarming is the fact that representatives of academic science are doing this, while hiding their true intentions. "

I would especially recommend this book to my fellow physicians. Since for Russia, as well as for America, “such a situation is relevant when doctors who do not have sufficient training in the field of nutrition prescribe milk and nutritional cocktails based on sugar to overweight diabetics; a diet high in meat and fat for patients seeking weight loss; and supplemental milk for patients with osteoporosis. The health damage caused by doctors' ignorance about nutrition is mind-boggling. " Perhaps this book will help make the “personal graveyard” of each doctor a little smaller.

If a miracle happens and the people who make decisions about the nutrition of our nation do not remain indifferent and criminally careless (or criminally cynical), then our children and grandchildren may have a chance not to lose their health in kindergarten and school canteens!

And every adult, after reading this book, will be able to make their own informed choice based on reliable information. I have already made mine and for the first time in my life observed Great Lent this year, because the restrictions on food set by him absolutely coincide with the recommendations of Colin Campbell!

And I am very proud that I personally know Professor Philip James, who did not allow the implementation of the intention to "bring the World Health Organization to its knees if it does not abandon its recommendations" to please the industry lobby. Will this happen in our country? Wait and see!

Lydia Ionova,
dietitian, founder of the "Clinic of Dr. Ionova",
author of the book “Healthy habits. Diet of Dr. Ionova "

Dedicated to Karen Campbell - her incredible love made this book appear

And to Thomas McIlvane Campbell and Betty Demott Campbell for their amazing gifts

Foreword

If your life is similar to the life of most modern Westerners, then you are surrounded by chain fast food outlets. You are bombarded with fast food ads. You see other advertisements for weight loss, which say you can eat anything, not exercise, and still lose those extra pounds. In today's world, it's easier to find a Snickers bar, Big Mac or Coca-Cola than an apple. And your kids eat in the school cafeteria, where the vegetable experience is limited to ketchup on a hamburger.

This is what Yale University nutrition scientists and activists call the toxic food environment. Most of us live in this environment today.

The unforgiving truth is that some people make huge amounts of money selling junk food. They want you to continue to eat the food they sell, even though it makes you fat, your vitality dries up, and your life expectancy and quality of life decrease. They want you to be submissive, suggestible, and ignorant. They don't want you to be informed, active, and energized, and they are willing to spend billions of dollars every year to achieve their goals.

You can come to terms with this and put yourself at the mercy of the junk food producers, or you can develop a healthier and more life-affirming relationship with your body and the food you eat. If you want to be full of health, fit, have a clear mind and a cheerful spirit, then you need an ally.

Fortunately, you just have such an ally in your hands. Colin Campbell, Ph.D., is widely recognized as a brilliant scientist, passionate researcher, and great humanist. Having the pleasure and honor of being his friend, I can state this and add something else: he is also a man of great humility and depth.

Professor Campbell's book "China Study" is a veritable ray of light in the modern dark realm, illuminating nutrition and health issues so clearly and completely that you will never again become a victim of those who profit from your ignorance, misunderstanding and submissive eating of what they sell. products.

In my opinion, one of the many benefits of this book is that Campbell is not just presenting his findings to you. He does not preach from above, pointing out to you, like a child, what is and what is not. Instead, like a trusted friend who has managed to learn, discover and accomplish more in life than many of us can even imagine, he unobtrusively, clearly and professionally brings you the information you need to fully understand issues related to diet and health. It gives you the freedom to make informed choices. Of course, he gives advice and advice, and they are excellent. But he always shows how he came to certain conclusions. Information and truth is what matters. Its sole purpose is to help you live your life as informed and healthy as possible.

I have already read the China Study twice and each time I discovered a lot. This is a bold and wise book. It's incredibly helpful, superbly written, and essential. Campbell's work is groundbreaking yet striking in its clear and concise manner of presentation.

If you want to eat eggs and bacon for breakfast and then take your blood cholesterol-lowering medication, it's up to you. However, if you intend to truly take care of your health, read the China Study and start doing it! If you heed the advice of this outstanding consultant, your body will thank you every day for the rest of your life.

John Robbins, author of Diet for a New America, Reclaiming Our Health and The Food Revolution

Introduction

The public's need for information about healthy eating has always amazed me, even after I dedicated my life to experimental research in this area. Diet books have become long-term bestsellers. Almost every popular magazine has recommendations, newspapers regularly publish articles on the topic, and healthy eating is constantly discussed on television and radio.

Given this wealth of information, are you sure you know how to improve your health?

Should you buy food labeled "organic" to avoid exposing your body to pesticides? Are environmental changes the main cause of cancer? Or is your health condition "predetermined" by the genes you received at birth? Do you really get fat from carbohydrates? Should you be concerned about the total fat you eat, or just saturated fat, or trans fat? What vitamins should you take, and should you do it at all? Are you buying extra fiber-fortified foods? Should you eat fish, and if so, how often? Do soy foods help prevent heart disease?

It seems to me that you are not quite sure about the answers to these questions. And you are not alone. Despite the large amount of information and different opinions, very few people really know what to do to improve their health.

And the reason is not that no relevant research has been carried out. They were carried out. We know a lot about the relationship between nutrition and health. However, real science is buried under a mass of unnecessary and even harmful information: it is pseudoscientific research paid for by food companies, newfangled diets and propaganda carried out by the food industry.

I want to change that. I want to give you a new framework for understanding nutrition and health that will help you clear your doubts, prevent and treat disease, and lead you to a fuller life.

I have been in the system for almost 50 years, held very high positions, developed and led large research projects, decided which ones would be funded, and used a lot of research materials to prepare reports for national expert councils.

Many common beliefs about food, health, and disease are wrong:

Synthetic chemicals in the environment and food, no matter how harmful they are, are not the main cause of cancer.

The genes that you inherit from your parents are not the main factor in determining whether or not you fall prey to one of the top ten causes of death.

With the hope that genetic research will ultimately lead to cures for various diseases, the more effective solutions that exist today are being ignored.

Careful monitoring of your intake of any nutrient, such as carbohydrates, fats, cholesterol, or omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, will not lead to better long-term health.

Vitamins and supplements will not give you long-term protection against disease.

Medication and surgery do not cure diseases that kill most people.

Your doctor probably doesn’t know what to do to achieve the best possible health condition for you.


I offer you nothing more and nothing less than a revision of your ideas about good nutrition. The provocative results of my forty years of biomedical research, including the findings of a 27-year laboratory program (funded by the most reputable foundations), show that eating well can save your life.

I will not ask you to believe in conclusions based on my own observations, as some popular authors do. This book contains 750 references, and the vast majority of them are primary sources of information, including hundreds of scientific publications by other researchers that point to ways to reduce the risk of cancer, heart disease, strokes, obesity, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, osteoporosis, Alzheimer's disease, stones in kidney and vision loss.

Dietary changes can help diabetic patients stop taking medications;

For the treatment of cardiovascular disease, dietary changes are sufficient;

The occurrence of breast cancer is associated with the level of female hormones in the blood, which is determined by the food consumed;

Eating dairy products can increase your risk of prostate cancer;

The antioxidants found in fruits and vegetables improve mental performance in old age;

A healthy diet can prevent the formation of kidney stones;

There is strong evidence for a link between infant nutrition and type 1 diabetes, one of the most dangerous childhood illnesses.


These findings suggest that proper nutrition is the most powerful weapon against disease we have. And understanding this scientific evidence is important not only for improving health - it also has important implications for our society as a whole. We are obliged to know why misinformation prevails in our society and why we are deeply mistaken in matters of nutrition and disease, how we improve health and how we treat disease.

More than 40 years ago, at the beginning of my career, I would never have thought that food and health problems are so closely related. Over the years, I have never given much thought to which food is more correct. I just ate what everyone else was eating: what I thought was good food. We all eat what is tasty, or what is convenient, or what our parents taught us to eat. Most of us live in a specific cultural environment that determines our culinary habits and tastes.

All this applied to me. I grew up on a dairy farm where milk was the main product that determined our existence. We were taught in school that cow's milk helps to strengthen bones and teeth. This is the most perfect product created by nature. On our farm, most of the food was grown in the vegetable garden or grazed in the pasture.

I was the first in my family to go to college. I first studied Veterinary Medicine at Pennsylvania State University and then attended Georgia State University Veterinary School for a year before Cornell recruited me with a scholarship to work on my graduate study in Animal Nutrition. I moved there in part because they were going to pay me to study, not the other way around. I got my master's degree there. I was the last graduate of Professor Clive McKay of Cornell University, who was known for extending the lifespan of rats by feeding them much less food than they would like. My research, for which I received my Ph.D. from the same university, was about finding ways to accelerate the growth of cows and sheep. I was trying to improve our production of animal protein, a key element of what I was told is "good nutrition."

I was going to improve people's health by recommending more meat, milk and eggs for their food. This was an obvious consequence of my own life on the farm. All the time that my views were forming, I was faced with the same topic: apparently, we eat healthy foods, especially those rich in high-quality animal protein.

I spent most of my early years working with two of the most toxic chemicals ever discovered - dioxin and aflatoxin. At MIT, I first worked on the chicken feed problem. Millions of chickens per year died from an unknown toxic chemical that was part of their feed, and my task was to identify and determine the structure of this substance. Two and a half years later, I helped discover dioxin, probably the most toxic chemical known. It generated enormous interest, especially as it became part of the 2,4,5-T herbicide, or the so-called "Agent Orange", which was later used to kill leaves in Vietnamese forests during the war.

After leaving MIT to take up a position at Virginia Tech, I began coordinating technical assistance for a national project in the Philippines to work with malnourished children. Part of the problem was research into the significant prevalence of liver cancer in Filipino children, usually an adult disease. The disease was thought to be caused by high consumption of aflatoxin, which is found in mold rot found on peanuts and grain crops. Aflatoxin is one of the most potent carcinogens known.

For 10 years, we have worked to improve the nutrition of the poor for children. The project was funded by the United States Agency for International Development. As a result, we have established about 110 self-help nutrition education centers throughout the country.

The goal of these efforts in the Philippines is simple - to create the conditions for children to consume as much protein as possible. It was widely believed that the poor nutrition of children around the world is mainly due to a lack of protein, especially from animal foods. Numerous universities and governments have tried to reduce what they believe to be a protein deficit in developing countries.

However, in the course of this project, I uncovered a dark secret. Children whose diet was high in protein were more likely to develop liver cancer! These were children from the wealthiest families.

Then I came across a research report from India that contained very important and provocative findings. Indian scientists studied two groups of rats. To one group, they gave the cancer-causing aflatoxin, and the diet of these experimental animals contained 20% protein, which is comparable to the usual consumption in Western countries. To another group, they gave the same amount of aflatoxin, while the protein content in the rat's diet was only 5%. Incredibly, absolutely all animals whose food consisted of 20% protein developed liver cancer, while none of the animals that consumed 5% protein fell victim to this disease. It was one hundred percent, undeniable evidence that nutrition neutralizes the effects of carcinogens, even very potent ones, and helps reduce the risk of cancer.

This information contradicted everything I had been taught before. It was heresy to claim that proteins are not healthy foods, let alone increase your risk of cancer. This was a turning point in my career. It would not be wise to study such a provocative issue at such an early stage in my scientific career. By challenging the benefits of protein and animal food in general, I risked being labeled a heretic, even if I had compelling scientific evidence.

However, I have never tried to blindly follow generally accepted rules. As I was learning to graze horses or livestock, hunt animals, fish, or work in the field, I realized that independent thinking is an important component of success. It could not be otherwise. Faced with difficulties in the field, I had to figure out what to do next. This is a real school, ask any country boy. The feeling of independence has remained with me to this day.

So, faced with difficult choices, I decided to launch a laboratory program to thoroughly investigate the role of nutrition, primarily protein, in cancer. My colleagues and I were careful in formulating hypotheses, strict in adhering to methodology, and conservative in our conclusions. I decided to start with a scientific background and study the biochemical characteristics of cancer formation. It was very important to understand not only that do they cause proteins cancer, but also how it happens. The decision was correct. By rigorously following scientific rules, I was able to explore this provocative topic without resorting to the predictable automatic responses that are usually offered when putting forward revolutionary ideas. This study was largely funded over the course of 27 years the most respectable organizations (most notably the US National Institutes of Health, the American Cancer Society, and the American Institute for Cancer Research). Then our results were rechecked (again) for publication in many of the best scientific journals.

Our findings were shocking. A low-protein diet prevented the development of cancer caused by aflatoxin, regardless of how much of this carcinogen was consumed by animals. If cancer had already arisen, then a low-protein diet severely inhibited its further development. In other words, the cancer-causing ability of this carcinogenic chemical was virtually nil thanks to a low-protein diet. Protein was so powerful in our diet that we could stimulate and stop cancer by simply changing our intake.

Moreover, the amount of protein consumed by animals was equal to that usually found in human diets. We did not use more of them, as is very often done in the study of carcinogens.

In addition, we found that not all proteins have this effect. What protein has played a consistent and decisive role in provoking cancer? Casein, of which 87% is a protein contained in cow's milk, provoked and accelerated the development of tumors at all stages of the disease. What types of proteins did not cause cancer, even when consumed in large quantities? Safe proteins were found in plant foods, including wheat and soy. As this picture emerged, I began to question my most persistent beliefs, which then finally collapsed.

The animal experiments did not end there. I have spearheaded the most comprehensive study on human nutrition, lifestyle and disease ever conducted. It was an ambitious project co-organized with Cornell University, Oxford University and the China Institute for Preventive Medicine. The New York Times called it the "Grand Prix of Epidemiology." The project examined a large number of diseases, as well as factors affecting nutrition and lifestyle in rural areas of China and, later, Taiwan. This project, better known as the China Study, has resulted in more 8000 statistically significant evidence of the relationship between different dietary habits and disease!

This project was particularly noteworthy because so many of the relationships found between nutrition and disease led to the same conclusion: those who ate mostly animal food were more prone to chronic disease. Even relatively small amounts of animal food produced negative effects. In contrast, those who ate predominantly plant-based foods were healthier and generally avoided chronic disease. These results could not be ignored. All studies, from animal testing of the effects of animal proteins to large-scale studies of human nutrition, have led to the same conclusions. The health effects of eating animal and plant foods were very different.

I could not and did not dwell on the results of our animal studies and large-scale studies of the nutrition of the Chinese, as impressive as these data may be. I turned to the findings of other scientists and clinicians. Their findings turned out to be some of the most interesting in the last 50 years.

These results, presented in Part II of the book, suggest that cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity can be cured with a healthy diet. Other studies provide compelling evidence that nutrition affects the occurrence of various types of cancer, autoimmune diseases, diseases of the bones, kidneys, vision, brain disorders in old age (such as cognitive dysfunction and Alzheimer's disease). More importantly, a diet that has repeatedly shown the ability to heal and prevent these diseases includes the same natural plant foods that I have previously discovered through laboratory and nutritional studies in Chinese people to help you achieve optimal health. The results of these studies are consistent with each other..

Yet despite the compelling nature of this information, the hope it provides, and the urgent need to understand nutrition and health issues, people are still confused... I have friends with heart disease who do not work and are depressed due to the fact that they are at the mercy of a disease that is considered incurable. I have spoken to women who are so afraid of breast cancer that they would like to surgically remove their own breasts and even their daughters' breasts, believing that this is the only way to minimize the risk of getting sick. Many of my acquaintances were discouraged, following the path of illness, despondency and confusion caused by concerns about health and possible measures to protect it.

Many people are confused and I will explain why. The reason discussed in Part IV of the book has to do with how health information is created and disseminated and who controls it. Since I have had the opportunity to observe from the inside how information about health is created for a long time, I have seen what is really happening and am ready to tell the world what is wrong with the system. The lines between government, industry, science and medicine have become blurred. The problem with the system is not corruption, which is usually portrayed in Hollywood style. The problems are much more subtle and at the same time much more dangerous.

The book is dedicated to this story, which began with my personal experience and culminated in the formation of new views on nutrition and health. Several years ago at Cornell University, I organized and taught a new elective course called Vegetarian Nutrition. This was the first time such a course was introduced at an American university, and it gained much more popularity than I could have imagined. This course focuses on the health benefits of a plant-based diet. After spending some time at MIT and Virginia Tech and then returning to Cornell University 30 years ago, I was tasked with integrating the concepts and principles of chemistry, biochemistry, physiology, and toxicology in a high-level course on nutrition.

John Robbins is one of the world's leading experts on the impact of diet on human health. His books Diet for a New America, Reclaiming Our Health, and The Food Revolution became bestsellers. Approx. ed.

The bibliography is available on the website www.mann-ivanov-ferber.ru/books/healthy_eating/the-china-study. Approx. ed.

Along with fiction, works of other trends fall on the shelves of book counters. A similar book is China Study. Colin Campbell, its author, has carried out a substantive study of certain types of food, making a connection with the chronic diseases that they can cause. What came of it, let's try to figure it out.

A topic for thought

This medical research, which later developed into an independent work, is rightfully called an unprecedented experiment. It began in 1983, and China, America and England have confirmed their participation in it. For more than twenty years, the search for an answer to the question of how animal products are associated with various diseases to which most of humanity is susceptible has continued. The China Study (Colin Campbell, professor in the Department of Biochemistry, co-authored with his scientist son Thomas) was published in 2004. By 2011, the circulation of sold copies exceeded 500 thousand. This placed the book on the bestseller list.

Theoretical foundations of the research

The statistical data of the districts were taken as a basis. The inhabitants of these districts spoke in detail about their preferences in food, and then donated blood for biochemistry and other necessary tests. Cancer was chosen as the main disease with which the assumptions of scientists were associated. In total, the study involved over 6,500 people, and according to its results, 8,000 connections between disease and nutritional factors were found.

"China Study" (Colin Campbell remained the curator and main ideological inspirer throughout the experiment) announced the results of the experiments to the readers. All of them were authorized by the state. Moreover, the scientist and his team had 74 grants, allowing them to study in the laboratory as experimental rats were infected with the carcinogenic aflatoxin. Their diet contained more or less protein. Collectively, this led to the development of cancerous tumors, which again confirmed the connection between disease and food. Scientists have found a way to slow down and even speed up the development of tumors.

What we eat and what we can't

After several years of direct research, it took time to document the tests on paper and prepare the results in hard copy. Campbell himself prepared the book for publication and talked about it. The "Chinese study" confidently asserted that people who do not consume animal products (almost all types of meat, eggs, milk and cheese, as well as refined carbohydrates were named as such) are less susceptible to developing chronic diseases. As an alternative, it was proposed to increase and diversify the consumption of cereals, legumes, fruits, herbs and vegetables. Another prerequisite for the safe use of these products is their processing. Herbal ingredients have a large number of biochemical components that can participate in the reactions required by the human body.

The right to vegetarianism

As soon as the book goes on sale, readers' reviews inevitably await it. The "Chinese Study" was no exception: the criticism boiled down to the fact that its author called not to eat meat, referring to the fact that it is supposedly the main catalyst for the development of diseases. Some saw this as discrimination based on taste preferences, to which Campbell replied that he did not insist that his readers become vegetarians, but only invites them to exclude certain foods from the diet and justifies such a choice from a scientific and practical point of view. In 2010, he praised the book. After that, he followed the advice of its authors, abandoning dairy products and focusing on vegetables.

China Study (Colin Campbell): Book Reviews

Simultaneously with ordinary readers, for whom the author's work was presented as practically grounded recommendations, the work was expected to be criticized by fellow scientists. The extensive conclusions of specialists in various fields led to a public outcry, causing numerous controversies and discussions about the reliability of the presented studies.

Thus, methodological errors were found in the author's work. He did not take into account the differences in the level of activity of the subjects, geography and climate. A separate part of the experiments is not supported by scientific evidence, but is based mainly on the observations and personal conclusions of Campbell, albeit confirmed in the laboratory. In a word, this was not enough for an unambiguous conclusion. Results based on the causal relationship between food intake and disease should not be considered guidelines, but hypotheses that should be used as the basis for future more detailed studies.

Proper nutrition is the best option

Colin Campbell pays a lot of attention to vegetables as an example of healthy and correct food, but does not fully cover the issues of the recommended diet, in which meat appears as the main competitor to plant components. The Chinese Study says practically nothing about the role of meat in the human diet. The critics' reviews are very strict: if you focus on vegetarianism, then what about the heavy metals and pesticides that enter our body with food? Forgetting the importance of a balanced diet, Campbell ignores the problem of unbalanced diets that exclude meat. Among such problems, nutritionists call a lack of proteins, amino acids necessary for the body, zinc and various groups of vitamins.

Large-scale disappointment

The abstract of the book promises a real revolution in the views on the principles of proper nutrition. But what happened in practice? In the opinion of the readers, the vagueness of the given facts and the lengthy narrative are the main disadvantages on which the "Chinese study" is built. Colin Campbell does his best to add value to his work, praising work, promising a personal contribution to the vision of healthy eating.

But the readers never found out the truth. Instead, there are hundreds of pages detailing the properties of products that are already known. In a rather veiled form, and sometimes without supporting evidence, Campbell tells about the harm caused by animal proteins. Special attention is paid to fast food, which is widespread in our country as well.

Thus, the book "China Study" does not bring anything new. The theory of studying a very interesting and necessary topic is stretched as much as possible to a book format. In fact, one could get by with an article in a scientific journal.

Those who read the "Study" and those who did not, will come to one conclusion: if you want to take care of your health, do not overuse animal products, but focus on those that contain natural vitamins and nutrients.

Recently, there has been a surge of interest in the West in vegetarianism - partial (ovo-lacto-vegetarian) or full (vegan). According to rough estimates, vegetarians make up up to 3% of the population in the United States, and up to 4% of the population in Canada. Previously, goods for vegetarians, such as soy milk and meat substitutes, could only be bought here in small specialty stores, but now they have appeared on the shelves of large supermarkets. There is also an increasing number of cafes and restaurants serving only vegetarian dishes. According to the survey results, such cafes are visited by both vegetarians and people in transition - showing an interest in vegetarianism and considering it useful, but not yet fully ready to completely give up meat.

Meanwhile, in Russia, the attitude towards vegetarianism remains mostly negative *, as can be judged by the attitude of the overwhelming majority of articles devoted to this topic. Many of them claim that the human body needs animal protein and that a complete rejection of meat is fraught with serious problems.

Why is it different in the West? The answer is to be found in scientific research over the past decades. **

Dr. Campbell and the protein problem

The first American scientist to question the postulate of the usefulness and necessity of animal protein was Dr. Thomas Campbell, a Georgia State University graduate. Shortly after graduation, the young scientist was appointed technical coordinator of a US project to improve child nutrition in the Philippines. This appointment was to change not only his life, but the entire direction of American nutrition.

In the Philippines, Dr. Campbell had to investigate the unusually high incidence of liver cancer among local children. At the time, most of his colleagues believed that this problem, like almost all other health problems of the Filipinos, was due to a lack of protein in their diets. However, Dr. Campbell drew attention to a strange fact: the most common cases of liver cancer were children from wealthy families who did not just lack protein foods. It soon became clear that the cause of the disease was the carcinogen aflatoxin, produced by the mold growing on peanuts. This toxin got on the plates to children along with peanut butter, since Filipino industrialists used the most low-quality peanuts that could no longer be sold for the production of butter.

And yet - why did they get sick more often in wealthy families? Just because they got the peanut butter more often? And then Campbell came across an article published by researchers from India. This article argued that if one group of rats is kept on a high-protein diet (20% protein), and the other on a low-protein diet (5% protein), and then fed them the carcinogen aflatoxin, then in the high-protein group 100% of animals will get cancer, while while in low-protein all animals will remain healthy. Of course, when he shared this information with his colleagues, their reaction was unequivocal: “This is nonsense! They mixed up the labels or forgot to give the second group of rats a carcinogen. " Indeed, it seemed the most logical explanation. Yet Campbell never got the article out of his head. Finally, he decided to tackle the problem of the relationship between nutrition and the development of tumors himself.

Proteins and carcinogens

Back in the United States, Dr. Campbell began animal experiments, to which he devoted nearly three decades! Funding for the research was provided by reputable organizations such as the National Institute of Health, the American Cancer Society, and the American Center of Cancer Research. The experimental results are published in leading scientific journals.

And the results were shocking. The carcinogen aflatoxin invariably caused tumors in rats fed a high-protein diet (the amount of protein is slightly higher than the recommended norm), and it turned out to be completely harmless in rats fed a low-protein diet (below the recommended norm). Moreover, it turned out that if rats, previously kept on a high-protein diet, and already having tumors in their bodies in the early stages of development, were transferred to a low-protein diet, tumor development stopped. However, the tumor did not disappear completely, but as if it were in a frozen state - as soon as the protein content in the diet of animals was increased, the tumor growth resumed.

What seemed especially strange was that it was mainly animal proteins, such as milk protein, casein, that had this effect. In contrast, most plant proteins, such as wheat and soy proteins, did not have such a pronounced effect on tumor growth.

Could it be that animal food has some special properties that contribute to the development of tumors? And are those who eat predominantly meat really more likely to get cancer? A coincidence of circumstances helped to test this hypothesis.

Cancer map

In the 1970s, Chinese Prime Minister Chou EnLai was diagnosed with cancer. Already at the terminal stage of the disease, the prime minister decided to conduct a nationwide study to find out how many people in China die each year from certain forms of cancer. The work was titanic, and the result was the Atlas of Cancer - a detailed map of the death rate from 12 different types of cancer in 2,400 districts among 880 million (96% of the population) people for 1973-1975. And at the same time, data were collected on many other diseases.

From this map, one could clearly see that the death rate for different types of cancer in different regions of China varied very widely. For example, in some areas, the death rate from lung cancer was 3 people for every 100 thousand per year, and in others - 59 people. For breast cancer it is 0 in some areas and 20 in others. The total number of deaths from all types of cancer ranged from 70 people per 100 thousand per year to 1212 people. Moreover, the map clearly showed that all types of cancer, as if by agreement, chose approximately the same areas, so that the entire territory of China was divided into high-cancer and low-cancer regions. And this fact certainly demanded study.

In 1980, Dr. Chen, one of the leading Chinese scientists participating in the compilation of the Cancer Atlas, came to Cornel University, where Dr. Campbell conducted his experiments on rats. He was also very interested in the possible role of nutrition in the development of cancer. The outcome of this visit was the large-scale China-Cornell-Oxford Project, now better known as the China Study.

The starting point for the study was the Cancer Atlas, which contains data on the incidence of cancer and other chronic diseases in most of China for the period 1973-75. Of course, it was unrealistic to repeat such an extensive survey again, so 65 administrative districts were selected for further work.

As a result, American and Chinese scientists collected detailed information on nutrition, lifestyle and chronic diseases of 86 million people, first in 1983-84 and then (for the same people) in 1989-90. Together with the data contained in the Cancer Atlas, this compiled statistics on diet and chronic disease from 1973 to 1990 - 17 years.

Diseases of excess

Analyzing the data obtained, the researchers drew attention to the noticeable differences in the diet of Americans and Chinese. If the average American got about 15-16% of calories from protein in those years, 80% from animal protein, then the average Chinese consumed only 9-10% of protein calories, of which no more than 10% came from animal protein. At the same time, the Americans consumed almost twice as much fat as the Chinese, while plant fiber, on the contrary, was half as much. However, not all Chinese ate the same. In poor rural areas, people mostly ate what was grown in the area. Few could afford to eat meat or even dairy products. In the more developed areas, shops appeared, in which it was already possible to buy a wider range of products, including meat and milk. With industrialization, incomes rose and both the share of animal products in the diet and the total consumption of protein and fat increased.

The difference was also found in biochemical parameters. For example, the average Chinese blood cholesterol level was two to three times lower than that of Americans. Of course, you have already guessed which Chinese have high blood cholesterol levels. Of course, those who consumed more meat, milk and eggs.

It turned out that where meat was a rare guest on the table, malignant tumors were much less common. In addition, in the same areas, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, senile dementia (Alzheimer's disease), and kidney stones were rare. But all these diseases in the West were considered a common and inevitable consequence of aging. So common that no one ever thought about the fact that all these diseases can be the result of malnutrition - diseases of excess. However, a Chinese study pointed to just that, because in areas where meat consumption increased, blood cholesterol levels soon began to rise, and so did the incidence of cancer and other chronic ailments.

Not only China

The Chinese counterpart in the United States is the Adventist health Study I * (footnote - The Second Adventist Health Study started in 2002 and is ongoing) conducted by Loma Linda University in California. During the period from 1974 to 1988, scientists monitored the health of 34,000 adherents of the popular Seventh-day Adventist Church in the United States (hereinafter, simply Adventists), most of whom did not eat meat, milk and eggs. A detailed comparison of disease statistics among Adventists and an equal number of California residents showed that:

Adventist men live an average of 7.3 years longer than other California residents, and women live 4.4 years longer.
All Adventists have significantly lower rates of cancer.
Those Adventists who do occasionally eat meat (especially red meat) are twice as likely to get colon cancer and 2.5 times as likely to have ovarian cancer than those who strictly adhere to the rules of abstinence from animal foods.
Those who eat meat at least once a week have a 76% higher risk of type 2 diabetes.
Those who eat legumes frequently rarely get colon cancer.
Men who regularly consume tomatoes are 40% less likely to get prostate cancer.

Although the Adventist Health Study was significantly inferior in scope to the China Study, the volunteers participating in it were large enough and the follow-up time was long enough that its results could no longer be ignored. And the results again indicated that the consumption of animal foods somehow contributes to disease.

Vegetarianism against disease

By now, there are many studies that confirm that vegetarians live longer on average than non-vegetarians and are less likely to develop many chronic diseases.

For example, according to statistics, approximately 8% of all Americans have type 2 diabetes. However, among American vegetarians, the level of diabetes was significantly lower - about 3%. This is despite the fact that the vast majority of American vegetarians grew up on the typical high-protein, high-carbohydrate, and high-calorie American diet and stopped eating meat as adults.

The data obtained from observations of representatives of peoples who traditionally do not consume meat are also very interesting. For example, the Tepehuanos Indians live in Mexico. Until the beginning of the 21st century, they were strict vegetarians, but now they are gradually becoming involved in meat-eating. Observations of members of this tribe, carried out in the periods 1995-1996 and 2006-2007, showed that while they ate only plants, they did not have diabetes at all. In addition, obesity and cardiovascular disease were rare. By 2006-2007, when the Indians were supplemented with meat, they were consuming about twice the amount of saturated fat, protein and calories. This led to an increase in the incidence of obesity (from 11 to 22%), hypertension (from 1.7 to 3.4%) and diabetes (from 0 to 0.88%).

Compared to non-vegetarians, vegetarians have significantly lower levels of many types of cancer, Alzheimer's disease (about half), atherosclerosis, and obesity. There are also studies that show that a low-fat vegetarian diet has not only preventive, but also therapeutic effects - for example, it can reduce the frequency of angina attacks, as well as significantly improve the well-being of people with diabetes.

What is the fundamental difference between animal and plant foods, and what explains the already well-proven fact that vegetarians, for the most part, have better health than those who eat meat?

Too much protein

Let us recall that the main building material of living organisms is protein, and the main building material for protein is amino acids. Proteins that enter our body with food are first broken down into amino acids, and then all the proteins we need are synthesized from these amino acids. In total, 20 amino acids are involved in the synthesis of proteins, of which 12 can be rebuilt, if necessary, from carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, etc. Only 8 amino acids are not synthesized in the human body and must be supplied with food. Therefore, they are called irreplaceable.
All animal products are very rich in protein, and this protein contains a complete set of 20 amino acids, taken in the right ratio. In contrast to animal proteins, plant proteins rarely contain all the amino acids at once, and the total amount of protein in plants is less than in animal tissues.

Until recently, scientists believed that the more protein, the better. However, it is already known that the process of protein metabolism is accompanied by an increased production of free radicals and toxic nitrogen compounds, which play a significant role in the development of chronic diseases. Therefore, although it is certainly impossible to live without protein at all, it is also not worth overloading your body with it. Protein abundance is especially dangerous in the presence of microscopic foci of malignant tumors in the body - because thanks to this, they uninterruptedly receive the building material that they need for rapid growth.

Many scientists now agree that reducing the amount of protein in the diet is one of the most effective ways to increase life expectancy, slow aging and reduce the risk of cancer. However, in practice, it is not so easy to constantly control the amount of protein you eat. Only vegetarians need not worry about this, as their diet is naturally low in protein.

Fat is fat

Fats of plants and animals differ greatly in their properties. Everyone knows that animal fats are dense, viscous and refractory fats (the exception is fish oil). Plants, on the other hand, with rare exceptions, contain liquid oils. This external difference is due to an important difference in the chemical structure of vegetable and animal fats.

Animal fats are mainly composed of saturated fatty acids, that is, those that do not have double bonds. Vegetable oils contain a significant amount of unsaturated fatty acids with at least one double bond.

All saturated (no double bonds) and monounsaturated (with one double bond) fatty acids can be synthesized in the human body. But fatty acids that have two or more double bonds (polyunsaturated) are irreplaceable and can only be obtained from food. Ironically, it is these fatty acids that play an extremely important role in the human body. In particular, they are material for the synthesis of prostaglandins and other signaling molecules of the immune system. In addition, they provide the necessary mobility of cell membranes (membranes) .With their lack, various disorders develop - chronic inflammatory diseases, peeling and dry skin, etc. In recent years, data have been obtained that essential fatty acids also play a large role in the antitumor defense of the body. development of the nervous system, and are also able to prevent many diseases of the heart and blood vessels.

You can, of course, take capsules containing oils rich in essential fatty acids. However, a typical vegetarian diet, which includes nuts, whole grains and vegetable oils, fully meets the human needs for these substances.

Alimentary fiber

Plant food contains a significant amount of complex carbohydrates that are not digested in the human intestine - the so-called dietary fiber or plant fiber. These include, for example, cellulose, dextrins, lignins, pectins. Some types of dietary fiber are not digested at all, while others are partially fermented by the intestinal microflora.

It is now known that for normal functioning the human body needs both groups of dietary fiber. First of all, they prevent such an unpleasant phenomenon as constipation, and in addition, they play an important role in binding and removing various toxins from the body. Finally, during the fermentation of dietary fiber, many biologically active substances are formed that reduce inflammation, increase immunity and have anti-cancer effects.

Dietary fiber is now easy to buy in the form of nutritional supplements. However, most scientists agree that Nikaike nutritional supplements cannot replace the entire wealth of dietary fiber that comes into our bodies in fruits, vegetables and whole grains.

Green pharmacy

Plants synthesize a huge amount of biologically active substances that are not found in animal tissues, many of which are vitamins, antioxidants, and also have the ability to slow down the development of cancerous tumors, lower cholesterol and prevent the development of cardiovascular diseases. Examples are carotenoids (carrot and sea buckthorn beta-carotene, tomato lycopene), vitamin C, soy phytoestrogens, red wine resveratrol (has anti-cancer activity), green tea polyphenols. Many useful substances are found in spices (curcumin from turmeric, which has antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiviral properties, alicin from garlic, which has powerful immunostimulating and antimicrobial activity).

Nowadays, many people spend a lot of money buying all kinds of nutritional supplements containing the widely advertised biologically active substances of plants. Not everyone knows that almost all of these substances can be obtained by consuming a sufficient amount of fruits, berries and vegetables.

Is it possible to live without meat

As you can see, there are many important substances that can only be obtained from plants, since animals do not synthesize them. However, there are also some substances that are easier to obtain from animals than from plant products. These substances include calcium, zinc, and vitamins A, D3 and B12. But even these substances, with the exception of vitamin B12, can be obtained from plants, provided that the diet is properly planned.

To prevent the body from suffering from a lack of vitamin A, vegetarians need to eat orange and red vegetables, since they are rich in the precursor of vitamin A - beta-carotene. Carrot juice and sea buckthorn oil (or fresh sea buckthorn) are also helpful.

It is also not so difficult to solve the problem of vitamin D3 - for this it is enough to regularly visit the sun and not get carried away with sunscreens. Vitamins are an alternative to the sun.
For a long time it was believed that vegetarians are doomed to iron deficiency anemia, since plants lack the most easily assimilated form of iron - heme iron. However, now there is evidence that when switching to an exclusively plant-based diet, the body adapts to a new source of iron and begins to assimilate non-heme iron almost as well as heme. The adaptation period takes approximately 4 weeks, during which hemoglobin may temporarily decrease. An important role is also played by the fact that in vegetarian food iron enters the body along with vitamin C and carotenoids, which improve the absorption of iron. A diet rich in legumes, whole grains, and dried fruits (such as figs, dried apricots, and prunes) and dark green vegetables is the best for your iron needs. The same diet helps to normalize zinc levels. Ovo-lacto vegetarians should be aware that milk interferes with iron absorption and should be drunk separately from iron-rich foods.

Although milk is considered the most important source of calcium, it is in those countries where it is customary to drink a lot of milk that the rate of osteoporosis (senile bone thinning, leading to fractures) is highest. This allows you to question the postulate of the need for milk. It has also been proven that the need for calcium decreases significantly with a decrease in the amount of animal protein in the diet due to a decrease in its excretion from the body. Therefore, despite a decrease in calcium intake, vegetarians can have normal calcium levels in the body. Sources of calcium for strict vegetarians include green leafy vegetables (such as spinach), legumes, kale, radishes, and almonds. In the West, calcium-fortified fruit juices and tofu are widespread.

The biggest problem is vitamin B12. This vitamin is synthesized by bacteria that live in the soil, so in those countries where it is customary to wash vegetables and hands thoroughly, vegetarians may not have the necessary bacteria, which creates the risk of a B12 deficiency. The lack of vitamin B12 in childhood is especially dangerous, as it leads to a slowdown in mental development, problems with muscle tone and vision, and impaired blood formation. Therefore, nutritionists recommend taking vitamin B12 preparations for strict vegetarians living in civilized countries, and especially for pregnant women and nursing mothers. Nowadays, many vegetarian foods, such as soy milk and soy meat, are fortified with vitamin B12 in the West, so there is no problem with it.

What about the essential amino acids, which, as many remember from school, are absent in plants? In fact, plants also have them, but they, more often than not, are scattered across different plants. It has now been proven that a person does not have to receive a full range of amino acids for breakfast, lunch and dinner, and it's okay if they come "in installments." Moreover, interruptions in the supply of building material are even useful, since, firstly, they induce the body to more actively destroy worn-out and damaged cells, and secondly, complicate the life of malignant tumors.

Vegetarian pyramid

Currently, the American Dietetic Association (ADA) and dietitians of Canada are unanimous in recommending a vegetarian diet, believing that a well-planned vegetarian and vegan diet is beneficial to health, provides a person with all the necessary components and helps prevent a number of chronic diseases. Moreover, according to American nutritionists, such a diet is useful for everyone, in any condition of the body, including pregnancy and lactation, and at any age, including children. * (Footnote - the opinion of American and Canadian nutritionists published in the journals: Can J. Diet. Pract Res 2003; 64 (2): 62-81, J. Am Diet Assoc 2009; 109 (7): 1266-82). It should be noted that in this case we mean a complete and correctly composed vegetarian diet, which excludes the occurrence of any deficiencies. For convenience, American nutritionists provide pyramid-shaped food choices (rice).

At the heart of the pyramid are cereals, which must include whole grains (for example, whole grain bread, oatmeal, buckwheat, brown rice). These foods should be eaten for breakfast, lunch and dinner. They contain carbohydrates, protein, B vitamins, minerals, dietary fiber.

This is followed by vegetarian foods rich in protein, such as legumes, nuts or meat and milk substitutes (soy milk and soy meat, tofu, etc.). Nuts (especially walnuts) are also a source of essential fatty acids, while legumes are rich in iron and zinc.

Even higher are vegetables, which must necessarily include dark green and leafy vegetables - sources of iron and calcium, as well as yellow and red vegetables - sources of carotenoids. Fruits are placed after vegetables, but this does not mean that their consumption should be somehow limited. The fact is that the pyramid shows the minimum required amount of fruits, and does not set their limit.
At the very top of the pyramid are fats rich in essential fatty acids (vegetable oils). The daily requirement is approximately 1 tablespoon of oils, including those used in cooking and dressing salads.

Of course, like any average eating plan, the vegetarian pyramid has its drawbacks. For example, she does not take into account that in old age the body's building needs become very modest and it is no longer necessary to consume so much protein. On the contrary, in the diet of children and adolescents, as well as people involved in manual labor, there should be more protein. However, the pyramid gives a good idea of ​​what a well-planned vegetarian diet is and why people who follow it are not nutritionally deficient.

Conclusion

Currently, Western nutritionists not only recognize that a person can do without meat food, but also consider such food to be beneficial to health. Numerous studies have confirmed that vegetarianism significantly reduces the risk of "diseases of abundance", which include obesity, atherosclerosis, many types of cancer, diabetes, senile dementia and other diseases, the tendency to which increases with constant overload of the body with animal protein, calories and saturated fat.

An additional advantage of a vegetarian diet is a significantly higher level of consumption of vegetables, fruits, legumes, as well as spices and aromatic herbs, which are so rich in biologically active substances, compared to a mixed diet.

However, vegetarianism as such does not guarantee health. Remember that the diet should be varied, including wholesome, natural foods from all major food groups - vegetables and fruits, whole grains, and protein-rich foods. Only under these conditions, giving up meat will become your main step towards health and longevity.

Editor's Choice
Diaries: Touching you is a fairy tale. Kissing you is a shiver. Your affection is so lacking that I'm going crazy. This is not a lie. Without you, so ...

Current page: 1 (total of the book has 36 pages) [available passage for reading: 7 pages] Colin Campbell, Thomas CampbellChinese ...

In the modern world, knowledge of a foreign language has long become an obligatory item on a resume. Language skills make it much easier to find ...

Current page: 1 (total of the book has 13 pages) [available passage for reading: 3 pages] This book is well complemented by: Remember everything Arthur ...
Current page: 1 (total of the book has 22 pages) [available passage for reading: 5 pages] Barbara Sher, Annie Gottlieb Dreaming is not harmful. How...
Dedicated to my grandfather, Herman Arkhangelsky, with gratitude for the introduction to the tradition of managerial thinking and for the right time ...
Finnish man Statistics Finnish men are like the dream of many women, more on this here: True, there are not enough of them ... ...
If one of the spouses decided to make secret acquaintances, then he has good reasons for this. The search for a mistress or lover is underway ...
When two people decide to register their relationship or live together, the last thing they think about is that the once ardent love will pass, and she ...